[TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

[Tommy]

Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have
something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the
hobby!

Tommy

W4BQF

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Ira Franklin
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

Guess I just get nervous with some of their plans, still remember that they
were the group that brought the great boon of incentive licenseing to ham
radio.

Ira  K4YMQ


Ken Brown <ken.d.brown at verizon.net> wrote:
Martin, AA6E wrote:

>AM forever! - read the article:
>
Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the
completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart
representations would be complete and accurate.

>
>"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
>continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
>sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
>limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively.
>
DE N6KB


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec