[TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

Tommy aldermant at alltel.net
Thu Apr 14 08:54:08 EDT 2005


Me also! You know if they are trying to regulate by bandwidth, they have
something up there sleeve that probably is not going to be good for the
hobby!

Tommy

W4BQF

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Ira Franklin
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

Guess I just get nervous with some of their plans, still remember that they
were the group that brought the great boon of incentive licenseing to ham
radio.

Ira  K4YMQ


Ken Brown <ken.d.brown at verizon.net> wrote:
Martin, AA6E wrote:

>AM forever! - read the article:
>
Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the
completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart
representations would be complete and accurate.

>
>"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
>continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
>sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
>limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively.
>
DE N6KB


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




More information about the TenTec mailing list