[TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)

[Bob Henderson]

Utter nonesense.

If the incoming signal is on 14025 and the IP product is zero beat with it,
then that will be on 14025 too. If the wanted signal is CW and the IP is a
carrier, then whatever audible tone you choose to listen to the CW at,  the
interfering signal in the form of the IP carrier will produce the same tone.
If one understands that zero beat is a relative term then one would readily
understand this and how interference between the IP product and the wanted
signal will be caused.

73

Bob, 5B4AGN

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX" <RMcGraw at Blomand.Net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)


> The original post indicated that the IMD was zero beat with the incoming
> signal.  Makes me wonder what part of zero isn't understood.  Either it is
> zero beat producing a sum signal (Fa + Fb) which is not heard and a
> difference signal (Fa - Fb) which is zero, again not heard.  Has nothing
to
> do with what frequency one prefers to listen to CW.  If one understands
what
> zero beat means then I need not explain further.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett at alum.mit.edu>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:44 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal)
>
>
> > 5B4AGN wrote:
> > >Well that depends upon what it is zero beat with.  If it is zero beat
> > >with
> > your listening frequency, then you are correct, assuming the IMD product
> > is
> > an unmodulated carrier.  However, I think zero beat in this context
means
> > "on the same frequency as the signal you are attempting to receive". In
> > that
> > case, the problem is rather more significant.
> >
> >         Apparently K4TAX listens to CW
> > signals at 0 Hz Pitch...and I thought
> > I liked a low pitch at 270 Hz!  :-)
> >
> >                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>