[TenTec] Orion v2.0

[NJ0IP]

No, no, no.

It's simpler.  It's like this:

We think we know what we know.
We know we know what we know we don't know.
But we don't know what else we don't know.
No?

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Bill Tippett
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 5:23 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Orion v2.0


"The message is that there are known knowns - there are things that we know
that we know. There are known unknowns - that is to say, there are things
that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns - there
are things we do not know we don't know. And each year we discover a few
more of those unknown unknowns."

         Similar to something I saw many years ago
but with a different context.  One of these
categories must apply to every posters on this
reflector.  I've formed my own opinions but it's
up to each of us decide who is which:

Competent Competent - Someone who is competent and knows it.
Incompetent Competent - Someone who is competent but doesn't know it.
Competent Incompetent - Someone who is incompetent and knows it.
Incompetent Incompetent - Someone who is incompetent but doesn't know it.

...the latter being the most dangerous category!  ;-)

                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec