[TenTec] New Rig Suggestion

[joel hallas]

Mark,

You have a great list of features, but I think it would be tough to 
deliver at that price. The closest I've seen is the IC-718 that I bought 
for my YL (W1NCY) when she got her General license a few yrs back. It 
wasn't much above your price point and does almost everything you ask 
except:

- not great with close in strong signals
- only has room for one additional filter and it's extra. but does have 
reasonable selectivity for casual AM as well as SSB, so $155 for an 
Inrad CW filter and you're good to go.
- doesn't have a built in tuner, but I have an SGC unit in the basement 
that puts her on my rhombic whenever she wants.

It's also easy for a beginner to operate.

Now if I could just get her to turn it on <g>! Actually, I take it on 
vacation, so all is not lost!

73 & GL in your quest!

Joel, W1ZR

Mark Erbaugh wrote:

>I find all the discussion of the Orion interesting and I think the Orion has
>it's place, but I think what is needed is an affordable starter radio.  We
>need a radio that a new ham can buy without breaking the bank, but one that
>won't disappoint with poor performance.  I realize that higher performance
>equipment costs more, but I hope there can be a happy medium.
>
>I don't know if the numbers would work out, but wouldn't it be fantastic if
>a new ham could get on the air with a new basic rig and antenna for under
>$500?
>
>Here's what I think would be needed:
>
>0) All mode, or at least CW, SSB, AM (maybe receive only).
>
>1) Decent receive performance. Able to work in midly harsh RF environments
>(i.e. able to stand up to many 20 or 40 over signals in the same band during
>a contest or pileup).
>
>2) Decent selectivity. I don't know if the cost effective approach would be
>DSP filters or a set of 4 crystal or mechanical filters (2400, 1800, 500 and
>250 Hz ).
>
>3) Built in computer interface - a new ham is going to want to do the
>soundcard modes - but the radio should be easily usable without a computer -
>i.e. have a user friendly front panel interface.  While we're talking about
>a computer interface, how about USB instead of RS232?
>
>4) Built in keyer.  I think any basic radio should support CW. A couple of
>basic memories would proably be a no-brainer and makes it a lot easier to
>call CQ.  Personally, I prefer to be able to program the memory with some
>sort of entry where you "type" in the text rather than having to key it in.
>A ham who is just starting out may have a hard time getting a decent enough
>fist to enter a basic message.  The keyer should be able to reverse dot and
>dash paddles from a menu rather than requiring a wiring change.
>
>5) Mechanically rugged and able to run off of 12 V ( not just 13.8 ) so the
>radio could be used portable. 120V AC operation should be considered.
>
>6) Built-in wide range automatic antenna tuner.
>
>7) Minimum of 50 watts (preferably 100). It would be nice if the power could
>be reduced to QRP levels, but a new ham shouldn't be saddled with the
>challenge of QRP right from the start - for my first few years in the hobby,
>I remember how frustrating it was to spend a whole evening calling or
>answering CQ's and getting no response.
>
>8) General coverage receiver - not needed for ham radio, but probably a good
>selling point.
>
>9) Relatively complete package without requiring additional options (at
>least at the $500 level). If a fully loaded rig could be bought for $500 and
>options could be left out reducing the price that might be workable - what I
>wouldn't want to see is a $500 radio that really needed about an additional
>$300 in options to be usable.
>
>I may be dreaming about what's possible, but I think the cost of equipment
>is becoming a deterrent to geting new folks into the hobby or of getting
>hams beyond the HT stage.
>
>
>
>73,
>Mark
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>  
>