[TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564); wide Inrad filters in N-1 or N-2 slots

[Jerry Volpe]

As the Omni-VI Plus 'cascades' (which is really a cool thing when you 
consider you get up to 16-poles of filtering at 9 MHz)  the N-1 or N-2 
filter behind the default 2.4 kHz 9 MHz filter putting the INRAD filters 
in the N-1 or N-2 position, instead of exchanging them with the 2.4 kHz 
filters will NOT give you greater receive bandwidth as you are still 
limited to the primary Ten-Tec 2.4 kHz roofing filter. Of course you do 
skate around the whole balanced carrier adjustment thing, but I still 
don't get it.

Jerald, KG6TT


n4lq wrote:

>I'm curious why you would put the 2.8khz filter in the N2 slot? I assume 
>you wanted to retain the stock 2.4khz transmit bandwidth while receiving 
>at 2.8khz? Am I on track?
>N4LQ
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: CROCDONZ1 at aol.com
>To: tentec at contesting.com
>Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:03:20 EST
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] WTB: Omni 6+ (564) 
>
>  
>
>>hi
>>i have one, its a nice rig, no issues at all, cosmetics are superb,
>>face is 
>>superb, all the filter slots on boith if's are full. in the 250 cw slot
>>and in 
>>the n2 slot i have 2.8 inrad filters installed, i JUST put them in. its
>>makes 
>>it a superb ssb rig! manual, power cord, and a 705 mic, (i have the
>>inrad ssb 
>>mod, uninstalled, i will send that along as well) if you are interested
>>i can 
>>send some pics, price is $1650 shipped and insured to your door. 
>>
>>don-kd9mf
>>_______________________________________________
>>TenTec mailing list
>>TenTec at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>  
>