[TenTec] Fixed BFO freq = Fixed Beat Note
Ken Brown
ken.d.brown at verizon.net
Mon Jan 31 00:36:22 EST 2005
There has been a lot of discussion about Omni's 1st IF filters, and the
CW audio note that we hear using them. I want to state the situation in
a way that might help understand it.
When we have a filter with sharp skirts and high rejection outside the
filter band pass, only the signals inside that bandpass will be heard.
This is used to make a receiver hear only one sideband and when the
filter bandwidth is very small it also limits the signals we hear to
that very narrow bandwidth. But what determines which sideband we hear
and what audio note is produced by signals that make it through this
filter? The BFO frequency relative to the filter bandpass frequency. If
the BFO frequency were variable we could set it so that we listen to any
audio note we like, or even listen to the opposite sideband, or both
sidebands. I can do this with my Hammarlund Super-Pro and my Kenwood
TS-440. Of course these radios are lacking in other kinds of performance
compared to the Omni VI.
In Ten-Tec Omni VI the BFO frequency is fixed, for any given mode, using
crystal oscillators. So for a narrow filter with a specific center
frequency, only a specific narrow range of audio tones will be heard.
Why not make the BFO variable so that we can adjust to any audio not we
desire? There are a number of reasons. If the BFO were adustable, the
frequency display would be incorrect (except when the BFO is just at the
right frequency) or some kind of compensation would have to be made to
the digital readout, or to the 1st local oscillator (VFO) frequency,
without changing the displayed frequency. To accomplish this would
require more control control loops of more oscillators, more complexity
and likely more phase noise. Another method (which is used in the Omni
VI second IF for the PBT) is to mix a single oscillator in at two
different places, one converting in one direction (down to 6.3 MHz in
the Omni PBT) and the other converting back in the opposite direction
(back up to 9 MHz in the Omni VI PBT scheme) This also adds complexity
and more possibilities for images and birdies, as well as the noise in
the additional oscillator.
If we were willing to give up some accuracy in the frequency readout of
the Omni VI (say for instance when not operating close to band edges) we
could just bend the BFO a little bit and get any audio note we like.
Perhaps with some firmware modification, and some interconnection with
the RIT control, we could make an upgrade that could give us control
over the audio beat note, without giving up frequency readout accuracy.
I'm not ready to take this challenge on right now. Maybe somebody else
will, and Inrad can sell the kit.
I hope someone finds this enlightening.
DE N6KB
More information about the TenTec
mailing list