[TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"

[NJ0IP]

Dave, take you calculator and multiply 2.54 (cm/in.) X 12 (in./ft.) = ?

My calculator says "30.48" every time I do this.

Well then, 3.05 is close enough and "3" is close enough for government work.

73
Rick (whose favorite band is the 121.9 ft. band - ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of DaveHeller
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 3:49 PM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"

Where did that 3.05 ft per meter come from?  Looks more like 3.28+
ft/meter.  Just remember two ratios:  2.54 cm/in and 39.37 in/meter.
And in finer measurements, l mm = about 0.040 inch.

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of denton
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:48 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"

Your system of measurements are not funny...ours are.
Look at any set of our building blueprints and look at the scale these
are 
drawn...12"=3/8"...cheeeeeee......now where did I put the architects 
scale...
It really was fun when I used to run Autocadd at work and was trying to
get 
my work scaled to fit on the size of paper I was plotting  for an 
architect....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "NJ0IP" <Rick at DJ0IP.de>
To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"


> Thanks Denton.  Sorry folks.  I forgot about that.  Guess I've been
using
> these funny measurements too long.
>
> As Denton says, a meter is about a yard.
> To be almost exact it is 3.05 ft. (and exactly 3.048 ft.)
> For all my planning I simply use "3".
> When I build, I use the exact value (if needed).
>
> Without exception, every time I quoted a meter value during this
topic, it
> wouldn't matter if you used 3 or 3.05 or 3.048.  That's the beauty in 
> these
> openwire fed antennas.
>
> With coax and resonate antennas, it's another story.  Then you do need
to 
> be
> exact.
>
> Next time I state a value in meters (except for bands) and fail to
quote 
> the
> approximate length in ft., I promise to buy everyone a beer - but you 
> gotta
> come to Munich to collect ;-)
>
> 73
> Rick
>
> P.S.  How are you guys managing to follow Lance in the Tour de France,

> with
> all the distances and speeds stated in metric?  GO LANCE, GO !!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of denton
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:58 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"
>
> Think of a meter as a long yard or slightly over 3' and it's easy to
> visualize.....
> I have often dearly wished we were on metric on this side of the
> pond...makes it a lot easier to do the math in my head...but then, I
am a
> retired engineering aide!
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee at bellsouth.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits"
>
>
>> Rick:
>>
>> A humble suggestion re your interesting e-mails re antennas
(including 
>> the
>> vert. dipole)...
>> Assuming that a majority of the reflector members are located here in
the
>> USA, might
>> you consider using the old fashioned measurement system, or at least 
>> both.
>> Most folks in the USA have not, and probably won't in the next 20-50 
>> years
>> (if ever), converted
>> to, or use, the metric system of measuring things (except those
>> technocrats
>> that lurk in the
>> halls of 'white tower' edifices (ie MIT, Yale, Princeton, etc).
>> Reading your dissertations causes this old man to have his eyes
'glaze'
>> over - and doesn't easily
>> translate.
>> Just a friendly suggestion.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec