[TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus

n4lq n4lq at iglou.com
Tue Jun 7 18:26:30 EDT 2005


Having owned the Flex SDR, 100w version, and having owned a Pegasus for 
a long time I can say this: 
The Flex radio is very very PC, sound card and software dependent. If I 
were going to use the Flex Radio a lot, I would dedicate a PC to it. 
Trying to run it with other applications results in mucho instability. 
The Flex makes the Orion look like the Rock of Gibraltar. When all is 
working, the FLex's receiver is simply amazing and the audio quaity is 
austounding. CW transmission is very crude and it cannot key very fast. 
At least it didn't 6 months ago. They keep updating the software however.

The Pegasus is tried and true. It's receive weakness is well know but 
when you turn it on, it just works.
N4LQ
-----Original Message-----
From: designer <designer at quickdata.com>
To: tentec at contesting.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:21:13 -0700
Subject: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus

> I did search the archives but found nothing current about the Pegasus 
> compared to Flex-Radio SDR-1000. Now that the Pegasus has been 
> discontinued, is SDR-1000 the only "living" game in town for SDR?
> 
> As used Pegasus's appear for sale from time to time. Has there been 
> any comparison between the Pegasus's RX and TX and that of Flex-Radio?
> 
> Thanks and 73,
> Paul, K7NHB
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 



More information about the TenTec mailing list