[TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad?
John L Merrill
jmerrill1 at adelphia.net
Fri Nov 18 15:27:16 EST 2005
Someone might correct me on this, but I think the INRAD filters have 3-4db
more insertion loss.
John N1JM
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Jim Reid
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:24 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec CW filters or Inrad?
> How good are the TenTec CW filters? Are they good or should I go with
> Inrad? TenTec 250 and 500 hz filters are both 6 pole. I think
> Inrad's are 8.
The Inrad filters have the steeper skirts, but.......the response rises up
again a ways out!! The Ten Tec filters do NOT. So, sort of depends upon
what you want the filter to accomplish. I had an Omni VI+ loaded with Inrad
filters for a couple of years. Sold it.
Now have an Omni VI, Opt 3. with all Ten Tec filters.
That is how I voted.
73, Jim W6KPI/KH6 ( used to be KH7M, but went back to my 1950's call.)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list