[TenTec] [microHAM] O2 AFSK (rear) with MicroHAM interface - bug?

Richard Detweiler rdetweil at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 3 21:21:04 EST 2006


I have the O1,

I never could get it to work going to the aux input,  there is a drop in 
audio through the micro keyer,

I use the 'mic' input, ( swithed in the audio control ) then used mic gain 
to control the audio level,
worked much better.

Rich
K5SF


>From: "Stephen M. Shearer" <wb3lgc at verizon.net>
>Reply-To: microHAM at yahoogroups.com
>To: "TenTec Group" 
><tentec at contesting.com>,	<orion at contesting.com>,<microHAM at yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [microHAM] O2 AFSK (rear) with MicroHAM interface - bug?
>Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:43:42 -0500
>
>Second Orion II Bug?
>
>I need to make some AF voltage measurements, but has anyone else seen the
>problem (tentec group or microham group).
>
>I am using the new O2 with a new microHAM MicroKeyer interface and was
>trying to run AFSK via the rear O2 input.  If it wasn't for the death of 
>the
>old micoham USB interface, I would be able to say for sure it was the O2.
>
>I can only drive the O2 to 50-60 watts, unless the speech processing is on.
>This is with full computer and microham drive. AUX drive is at 100. AUX 
>only
>is selected.
>
>My O1 had no problem running 100W with reduced AUX drive.  Don't ask to see
>what my old O1 will do, It can't.
>
>Side note: Mike input on the O1 needed ~40 to work, I only need 10 for full
>drive with the same mike with the speech processing at the same level (6-7)
>and it still sounds ok on the monitor.  Has the SP changed its level in the
>O2?
>
>MicroHAM question; are there more AF adjustments that I missed?
>
>Orion FSK; I went the route of trying to get the FSK working.  It works 
>just
>fine with MMTTY and Writelog once I got all the com ports set correctly.  I
>do need to get the AFSK working (sometime) so I can do PSK-31.  I am using
>FSK with mark-high?  I got the impression from the Orion manual that mark
>should be low, but then with the LSB "standard" things get reversed, I
>guess.  I have made a few OSO's to be sure.  With the Orion, FSK is a much
>better way to go then AFSK as the filters are dead on and don't need to
>offset to work.  I am sorry I didn't try it with my O1 (I used the "if it
>works, don't mess with it, approach.")...
>
>73, Steve WB3LGC
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM/
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     microHAM-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




More information about the TenTec mailing list