[TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar

GARY HUBER glhuber at msn.com
Wed Jan 4 08:35:11 EST 2006


Hi Bob,

Most of the classified RADAR technology of the era has become obsolete and downgraded. For the most part all the old analog designs are pretty much generally available to the public or can be had under the Freedom of Information Act. 

I was under non-disclosure for twenty-five years.... and that expired more than ten years ago.

Best regards,
Gary - AB9M
CSM(r)G.L.Huber
glhuber at msn.com<mailto:glhuber at msn.com>
gary.huber at us.army.mil<mailto:gary.huber at us.army.mil>
www.csm-gh.com<http://www.csm-gh.com/>
9679 Heron Bay Road
Bloomington, IL 61704
(309-662-0604)
National Webmaster for:
The Society of the Fifth Division
wm at fifthinfantrydivision.com<mailto:wm at fifthinfantrydivision.com>
www.societyofthefifthdivision.com<http://www.societyofthefifthdivision.com/>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX<mailto:RMcGraw at Blomand.Net> 
  To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec at contesting.com> 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:56 PM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar


  I worked for GE and worked on the GE system that did this.  That's all I can 
  or will say about it.

  73
  Bob, K4TAX

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "James Duffer" <dufferjames at hotmail.com<mailto:dufferjames at hotmail.com>>
  To: <tentec at contesting.com<mailto:tentec at contesting.com>>
  Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar


  > The Soviets were not the only ones using OTHR that utilized HF (some in 
  > ham
  > bands).  GE did testing that encroached on the ham bands (at times).  I am
  > saying that as I saw documentation that indicated this.  I have not
  > personally heard any interference that I could positively say was OTHR in
  > the last 15 years.
  >
  > de wd4air
  >
  >
  >>From: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt at ameritech.net<mailto:k8vt at ameritech.net>>
  >>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com<mailto:tentec at contesting.com>>
  >>To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com<mailto:tentec at contesting.com>>
  >>Subject: Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar
  >>Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:05:38 -0500
  >>
  >>GARY HUBER wrote:
  >>
  >> >When the Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used the
  >>HF echo to "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with their 
  >>OTHR
  >>pulse timing and jam their "B" scopes. As a former Radar Electronics
  >>Counter-Measures and Electronics Counter-Counter-Measures operator, I knew
  >>it was simply a matter of transmitting a signal of about the same
  >>frequency, duration, and slightly stronger than their "return" to confuse
  >>their operators.
  >> >
  >> >
  >>
  >>I guess we should all be thankful that they didn't confuse your Omni D
  >>for a swarm of U.S. ICBMs coming over the horizon...  ;-)
  >>
  >>_______________________________________________
  >>TenTec mailing list
  >>TenTec at contesting.com
  >>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > TenTec mailing list
  > TenTec at contesting.com<mailto:TenTec at contesting.com>
  > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
  > 


  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec at contesting.com<mailto:TenTec at contesting.com>
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>


More information about the TenTec mailing list