[TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no message)
Ron Zond
k3miy at csonline.net
Fri Jan 6 09:40:00 EST 2006
960 exceeds V by CMLV. Quintius Flavius
Minimus told me I was his star pupil in math (Roman) back in 150 AD. Oh, for
the good old days.
Ron
K3MIY
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Mike Hyder -N4NT-
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:30 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Any reason not to use 960p/s with Omni V? (no
message)
960 exceeds V by CML. This will create an inverted nomenclature
designation.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list