[TenTec] ARRL

Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP Rick at DJ0IP.de
Thu Feb 22 13:06:42 EST 2007


Yes John, and that little work of art caused the industry to move their
first IF from 45 MHz, which was already bad enough, up to 70 MHz, which is
even worse.  As a result, it's even more difficult to build a decent roofing
filter for these rigs!

I would gladly sacrifice 6m and general coverage to have a low first IF at
HF frequencies.  You get a better box that way (as long as we consider that
price plays at least a remote role).

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Geiger
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2007 17:38
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL

They did figure out before others to add 6m to most HF
rigs.

73s John W5TD





More information about the TenTec mailing list