[TenTec] Class A

[David S. McCallum]

YUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: RM 
  To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment' 
  Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:27 AM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A


  Most of those folks certainly do produce a lot of 'growling' bassy
  audio......  Great Audio???????????????????

  Ron, NU1U 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
  On Behalf Of Gary Hoffman
  Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 19:31
  To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A

  Perhaps, perhaps....but how does this relate to Ten-Tec radio equipment ?

  73 de Gary, AA2IZ


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "yahoo email" <barbiekenw at yahoo.com>
  To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
  Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:36 PM
  Subject: [TenTec] Class A


  > I think the folks who engage in all the modified audio and broadcast
  quality activity are folks who do not have a good healthy
  > activity outlet -- like CW, or a test bench.   Have you ever met someone
  who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator?
  > With the new "no C W" extra class operators, there will likely be more of
  this misguided activity.
  > Ken K5WK
  > _______________________________________________
  > TenTec mailing list
  > TenTec at contesting.com
  > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
  >
  >


  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec at contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec at contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec