[TenTec] Help me Decide ??

[Jim]

There are great opportunities and technology options for the ham community
out there.

The bottom line is that the ongoing technology migration is moving very
fast, and all kinds of radios old and new are going to be in the mix.

The Software Defined Radios (SDRs) are going to be a very powerful force, as
we move ahead into the future.

So, there will be a mix of technologies: Elecraft K-3 Radios, Ten Tec ORIONs
and OMNI VIIs, Flex SDR 5000 systems, ALPHA amplifiers, Tokyo Hi-Power Amps,
Ameritron Amps, STEPPIR Dream Beams (Ie; the new STEPP IR DB-36), and a
variety of other systems, that will provide a wide range of choices for the
Amateur Radio Operators.

So, grab the ones that you like and get on the air.........

K4PV



-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Stephen Halliburton
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 8:00 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Help me Decide ??

I have been designing and writing software since the 1960s and operate
primarily CW.  I think my Corsair is the perfect radio for me.  I don't
really want or need memories, pan displays, scanning, or any of that.
What I want is a solid quiet receiver, good filters and clean QSK.
I'm sure all that other stuff is fun to have, but for me it is not
at all necessary and doesn't have much to do with getting a signal
through, which is the primary purpose for a radio.

To put this in perspective though, I'm also a guy who thinks that
designing software so the user has to take his fingers off the
keyboard to use a mouse is silly.  With the Corsair I can operate
all the controls with my left hand and keep my right hand on the
paddles.  That's harder to do with a computer-driven rig especially
on Field Day with a gas lantern over a picnic table.

I don't doubt there are "better" radios in these days of DSP that
might beat mine by a few dB, but I'm happy to make that trade if
necessary to get continuous tuning and simple intuitive controls
that I can work without looking.  I suppose there is something
comforting about knowing that there is an actual circuit component
on the other end of each shaft.  If doesn't take much to understand
what will happen as I turn a knob of flip a switch.  Even under
difficult conditions, it's almost impossible to do something that
can't be quickly undone or corrected.  If amateur radio is really
about emergency communications, that's important.

....Steve WA2SOC



Duane Calvin wrote:
> How about an answer from the other side.  I work with computers all day
> long, and am very comfortable with them.  I also run digital modes, and
> enjoy CW.  I prefer a radio with knobs because there are just some things
> that are a lot faster without having to deal with a mouse or a keyboard.
> Some day I'll try a computer-operated radio (I've done a little), but give
> me a well-designed hardware interface any day.  Doing it by computer (to
me)
> is like driving a racing car in a computer game vs. driving a real racing
> car.  Fun, but little feel/feedback compared to the real thing.  I'm not
> disparaging software interfaces, they're just not for me. And I like
> computers and digital modes!
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec