[TenTec] greetings!

KEN RINDFLEISCH rindfleisch457 at msn.com
Sat Jan 5 14:06:20 EST 2008


Thanks I could not have said it better ,ken ke5nxo


>From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw at Blomand.net>
>Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
>To: <wb2vuf at arrl.net>,"Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
><tentec at contesting.com>
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] greetings!
>Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:23:46 -0600
>
>I liked Bwana Bob's comments, specially the brief response.  My comment to
>the question "do these rigs compare favorably with the (big 3) on voice?"
>Actually, they don't!.............they are better!
>
>Of course there's different operators, different mikes, different mike
>techniques and radio adjustments that will impact the sound of any radio on
>SSB.  Actually, none of them sound bad.  Some just sound better than 
>others.
>The biggest fault largely lies in the mike and with the way the operator
>uses same and sets up the radio.  Any radio can be made to sound bad, most
>sound good and a very few sound GREAT!
>
>If you want a radio that has the CW QSK performance that the others try to
>achieve, then you want a Tentec.  If you want a radio that has direct
>internet connection without a local computer, you want a Tentec.  If you
>want a radio that has one of the best receivers on the market, then you 
>want
>a Tentec.
>
>If you want a radio that has all the whistles and bells known to man, and a
>few yet to be imagined,  then you likely don't want a Tentec.
>
>I view it as "performance is what counts" and that comes from a Tentec
>radio. I encourage you to review Bob Sherwood Engineering performance
>measurements on current production radios.    Here's the link:
>http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
>
>73
>Bob, K4TAX
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bwana Bob" <wb2vuf at gti.net>
>To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 10:02 AM
>Subject: Re: [TenTec] greetings!
>
>
>Welcome, John, and, yes, they are excellent SSB radios, too.
>
>73,
>
>Bob WB2VUF
>
>john ferro wrote:
> > hello all, a new guy on the block - i'm new to tentec - i have always
> > overlooked these beautiful radios in favor of the kenwoods, icom and
> > yaesu's. getting tired of the all the hiss and lousy audio on some of
> > the japanese radios. thought i'd give ten tec a try and purchased a used
> > delta as my first ten tec radio - patiently awaiting its arrival, but i
> > have lots of questions concerning ten tec radios. i might just be a
> > convert! it's like i discovered a new world! i appreciate your patience
> > with me as i try to catch the learning curve - lots of questions coming.
> > i read all the time how superior tentecs are on CW, but i'm mostly a ssb
> > phone guy at this time - do the tentecs compare favorably with the (big
> > 3) on voice? thanks in advance. john
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get the device you want, with the Hotmail® you love.
> > http://www.windowsmobile.com/hotmailmobile?ocid=MobileHMTagline_1
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec




More information about the TenTec mailing list