[TenTec] 564 9 mHz Filters

[Jack B. Friend]

good luck finding what you want at a "good" price Bob,

jack


On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 15:43 -0400, Bob Good wrote:
> Thanks Jack for the reply.  I agree with you based on my present 17 year old 
> Omni.  Others have responded the INRAD while better, are for the select few 
> and expensive.  (((73)))  Bob
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jack B. Friend" <jfriend31 at comcast.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 9:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] 564 9 mHz Filters
> 
> 
> >i have all my filter slots full with TT 250Hz and 500Hz filters. i have
> > not tried Inrad filters so can't compare. i like the TT filters as they
> > are relatively quiet and have no ring. also found them thru this
> > reflector at considerably less than retail.
> >
> > jack
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 20:16 -0400, Bob Good wrote:
> >> I just purchased an Omni VI Plus (564) and I am looking to fill my "N-2"
> >> filter slot.  I have a 1.8 mHz TT filter in N-1 and the full complement 
> >> in
> >> the 6.3 slots.  I am 90% cw and have operated a Omni VI (563) for 17 
> >> years.
> >> I want a 500 Hz filter in this slot.  In your opinion should I purchase 
> >> the
> >> TT 217 or an "Inrad"  filter?  Roofing filter is a term I have yet to 
> >> learn.
> >> Your thoughts would be appreciated.  Any help for the OM?  Thanks  Bob 
> >> K4BG
> >> k4bg at planters.net
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec at contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec