[TenTec] Final Firmware O2

Rsoifer at aol.com Rsoifer at aol.com
Tue Nov 10 15:48:21 PST 2009


Hi,
 
I too am a generally happy owner of an O II, and don't see a really good  
reason to trade it for a K3.  However, I am a DXer and not a serious  
contester (not at this point anyway).  Were I a big-time contester I would  go for 
the K3 in a minute because of its better sub receiver and its ability to  
support CW Skimmer, neither of which do I, as a DXer, really need.  The O  II 
sub receiver is good enough for me and I like its general coverage.
 
To make the O II match those features of the K3 would require hardware  
mods, i.e., an O III or at least an O II Mk2.  So, I can see why T-T  are 
dragging their feet on O II firmware.
 
That said, I would still encourage T-T to follow through on O II firmware,  
if only to keep the customers' good faith.  The O II is an excellent  
radio.  Let's keep it up.
 
73 Ray W2RS 
 
 
In a message dated 11/10/2009 8:51:13 P.M. GMT Standard Time,  
turnbull at net1.ie writes:

sometimes in preference to the K3.   For one
thing the  external 



More information about the TenTec mailing list