[TenTec] Eagle Comparison

[Clayton Brantley]

Does anyone have a Lasalle they would trade for a Nissan?

Clayton N3EV



________________________________
From: george fritkin <georgefritkin at yahoo.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 12:52:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

Gosh I wish I had kept my old Studebaker. 

George, W6GF



________________________________
From: Paul Christensen <w9ac at arrl.net>
To: tentec at contesting.com
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 9:38:33 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle Comparison

> The Corsair II is a fine radio, from what I saw of a friend's one.  It
> might be adequate for all your hamming desires.  However, another issue
> is how much longer will parts be available for it, should something fail?
>I am thinking the same of my various radios, Kenwood 450, and Scout, and
Argonaut V.

I suppose we can find some irony in this.  Transceivers constructed 
pre-digital (displays, control, DSP, etc) likely have better longevity than 
those built afterwards.  New chips are born quickly -- and die quickly.  But 
consider any Collins, Hallicrafters, or Drake gear.  With minimal effort, 
one can find replacement parts -- many of which are better than the 
originals.  For example, Sprague Orange Drops or yellow-jacked Polypropylene 
in place of black beauty caps.  Also, carbon film resistors in place of 
carbon composition.  So, if I had to keep only one set of equipment working, 
I would gravitate toward pre-1980s equipment.

Paul, W9AC 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



      
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec