[TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle

[shristov]

mike bryce <prosolar at sssnet.com> wrote:

> So, is the Eagle that much better than the ICOM pro series?
> (The Atlas 210 has a better receiver than the Icom 756 Pro III?
> The Heathkit SB104 better than the unmodified Drake R4C?)

Receiver quality is a much more complex thing than, say, IM dynamic range.

IM dynamic range is a kind of limit. 
Under specific circumstances, if the limit is not exceeded,
the IM specification is irrelevant and other things
become responsible for the "receiver quality".


73,

Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA