[TenTec] receiver specifications ---Eagle

shristov shristov at ptt.rs
Fri Dec 17 12:24:15 PST 2010


mike bryce <prosolar at sssnet.com> wrote:

> So, is the Eagle that much better than the ICOM pro series?
> (The Atlas 210 has a better receiver than the Icom 756 Pro III?
> The Heathkit SB104 better than the unmodified Drake R4C?)

Receiver quality is a much more complex thing than, say, IM dynamic range.

IM dynamic range is a kind of limit. 
Under specific circumstances, if the limit is not exceeded,
the IM specification is irrelevant and other things
become responsible for the "receiver quality".


73,

Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA




More information about the TenTec mailing list