[TenTec] Question for techies

[Kimberly Elmore]

I think we need to remember that there is no one, single kind of noise. Noise 
comes in all sorts of flavors. A noise reduction algorithm that removes white 
noise won;t do us much good. On the other had, a noise reduction algorithm that 
leaves nothing but big signals is worse. It's always a trade-off and the trade 
offs made certainly won't meet everyone's desires. 


Kim Elmore N5OP



----- Original Message ----
From: Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP <Rick at DJ0IP.de>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, November 16, 2010 12:13:00 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Question for techies

John, I saw 3 reviews and 2 of them said the NR was good.
I believe it is excellent.
Please send a link to the post you are talking about.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Rippey
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 2:47 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Question for techies

I notice a comment by the first Eagle reviewer on eHam.net that the DNR
feature was unimpressive.

Similar comments have been made about the DNR feature in the Kenwood TS-590,
including it continues the (to me awful) SPAC
setup of the TS-570.

On the other hand, Icom's 7700 and 7600 seem to provide the best DNR
iteration so far, based on the comments I've seen. Yaesu, as usual, seems to
lag behind in the effectiveness of its various DNR iterations. So, why does
it seem so difficult for manufacturers (other than Icom) to get DNR right in
a DSP environmnent? Is it the cost of the hardware, firmware, software
engineers, or what?

73,

John, W3ULS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec