[TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

Fabrizio iz2kxc iz2kxc at tiscali.it
Wed Nov 16 12:06:35 PST 2011


Maybe they haven't paid for advertising,
Don't you?

73
Fabrizio
IZ2KXC
N2DN
iz2kxc at tiscali.it
iz2kxc at arrl.net
iz2kxc at wia.org.au
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dalton McCrary" <jdkkm at bellsouth.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?


That is a very good question. I saw that yesterday and wondered the same 
thing.

73,
Dalton - W4WUQ




________________________________
From: Steve Hunt <steve at karinya.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, November 16, 2011 12:41:21 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

Subject says it all!

http://www.edn.com/article/519742-Ham_radio_in_the_21st_century.php

Steve G3TXQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 



More information about the TenTec mailing list