[TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400

Cecil chacuff at cableone.net
Thu Apr 25 11:21:19 EDT 2013


The assumption here was that he already owned the Heliax.  If I were to buy new coax for my tower it would be just what I bought last time..Times Microwave LMR-600.  I have 6 150' runs out and up the 65' tower.

No regrets...

Cecil
K5DL

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 25, 2013, at 7:36 AM, "jack" <jfriend31 at comcast.net> wrote:

> after all I have read on coaxial cable, I would choose the LMR-400. the difference in signal loss at such a short run would not be noticeable to the ear.
> jack
> ak7o
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: GARY HUBER
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: TenTec Reflector
> Cc: SMC ; DX-IS at yahoogroups.com ; W9AML group-email
> Subject: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400
> 
> As I consider the materials required to replace my 30 year old tower, rotor, antenna and cables, I have several like new runs on LDF4-50A terminated with N-male which could run from my ground window (UHF female) to the top of my 53 foot tower (60 feet max LDF4-50A cable run)  where a flexible low-loss 10 foot jumper would terminate on a new BN-4000 and new TH-7 tribander.  This configuration would require the 60 feet max LDF4-50A cable run,  two half inch N female to UHF male adapters, one UHF double female and 10 feet of high quality RG8 cable as the jumper to the BN-4000.
> 
> The alternative which I’m leaning towards as it seems less likely to have connector/adapter loss and other potential problems is a single run of 75 feet of LMR-400 with factory terminated PL-259s between the BN-4000 and ground window UHF female termination. My current installation is 60 feet of RG-9913, a UHF double female adapter and a ten foot RG-8214 jumper.
> 
> I know the half inch Andrews Heliax has a much lower loss figure (0.357 db per 100 feet at 30MHz) for a given length versus the same length of LMR 400 (0.7 db per 100 feet at 30MHz) , but I’m thinking those three adapters (six connection points for loss) and their potential problems make it a wash or maybe the advantage goes to the 75 foot run of LMR-400.
> 
> I’d be interested in any comments or experiences you might have on the subject.
> 
> 73 ES DX,
> Gary -- AB9M
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


More information about the TenTec mailing list