[TenTec] Explanations of the Different Types of Filtering on Radios

Fri Aug 30 19:37:31 EDT 2013

Very informative explanations Cecil.  Just wanted to add that the acronym 
"RIT" is mostly self explanatory.  It means (R)eceiver (I)ncremental 
(T)uning and it does exactly as you explain it.  It tunes the  receiver (and 
the receiver ONLY) in small increments.  A lot of transceivers, such as the 
"Orion's" also have "XIT" which means it tunes the transmitter (and the 
transmitter ONLY) in small increments and leave the receiver frequency as it 
is displayed by the frequency readout.

I use the RIT a lot when being a net control as I NEVER change my TX 
frequency to accommodate off frequency check-ins.  A net is held usually on 
a particular frequency plus or minus QRM etc.  It's funny to hear a check-in 
say "you are off frequency" if you moved slightly for whatever reason.  My 
usual reply (with tongue in cheek off course) is "the net control is ALWAYS 
on frequency hi.. hi..".

Great job Cecil.  73, Tony VE3DWI.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <chacuff at cableone.net>
To: "Will Jones" <wjones at bellsouth.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" 
<tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Explanations of the Different Types of Filtering on 
Radios

> Ok, here goes with an analogy...
>
>
>
> I’ve been up in the Smokey Mountains many times and they have some of 
> these beautiful short tunnels through rocky hillsides for the roads to 
> pass.
>
>
>
> Lets say you were standing in the middle of the road at one end of one of 
> these short, straight tunnels looking through to the other side.  At the 
> other end of the tunnel you see a very nice looking young lady just to the 
> left of center and a really ugly old lady just to the right.  Of course 
> the desirable view at this point is the nice looking young lady but it’s 
> really difficult to get a good look because of the really ugly lady...so. 
> Say you had a knob that would allow you to move the end of the tunnel left 
> or right just enough to block out the view of the really ugly lady leaving 
> only the view of the very nice looking young lady...there you have IF 
> Shift....also called PBT by other manufacturers.
>
>
>
> Now re-center the knob where you have both ladies in view.  Hold up the 
> index finger of your right hand out at arms length.  Close one eye and 
> place that finger over the really ugly lady blocking the view of her and 
> leaving only the view of the nice looking younger lady...there you have 
> the Notch Filter.  It may not cover the whole view of the ugly lady but it 
> does enough to allow a better view of the nice looking young lady.
>
>
>
> The others are a bit more difficult to explain...
>
>
>
> RIT is really not a filter at all...just another way to tune the frequency 
> of the receiver a small amount without changing your transmitter 
> frequency. Say you are having a short SSB QSO after calling CQ with a 
> fellow who doesn’t seem to be tuned properly to your frequency and he 
> sounds like he has been snorting helium so you need to tune your VFO to 
> make him sound more natural.  If you tune your main VFO you are not only 
> tuning your receiver but also your transmitter...which will result in a 
> change in how you sound in his receiver.  Well on the next over he may 
> retune his VFO to make you sound normal in his speaker and it’s an endless 
> chase up and down the band. (this can be caused by radio alignment issues) 
> Better choice would be to engage RIT and just move your receiver until he 
> sounds natural to you which will not change your transmit frequency only 
> your receiver frequency leaving you sounding the same in his receiver and 
> less likely causing him to retune...ending the chase.
>
>
>
> DSP Noise reduction...well this being a software feature is implemented 
> differently in every manufacturers radios and sometimes even between 
> models in the same manufacturers radios.
>
> The goal of all is to reduce random noise as much as possible while 
> identifying the desirable young lady...um...signal and bringing it out of 
> the noise.  All this is done using math inside the computer.  Some work 
> better than others.  The Icom system works well at reducing background 
> noise without adding too much digital artifact noise as long as you don’t 
> over use it.  Seems some think if a little is good then a lot is 
> better...it’s a balance.  Turning the knob full clockwise will result in 
> digital noise and not help at all.  The DSP system on my Orion II is 
> different and I’m not sure exactly how to explain it..except the way 
> Ten-Tec does that advancing to a higher number increases the length of 
> time sampling is done before the digital filter is built.  Which results 
> in a better built filter in software but it takes longer to get there.  Of 
> course the desirable signal needs to be there for the duration of the 
> sample or it probably will have a hard time doing it’s job.  None of them 
> are magic...and most work well some times and not so well others...it’s 
> just another tool.
>
>
>
> Noise Blankers.  Most are designed to work on repetitive noise pulses like 
> old auto ignition system noise or electric fence pulses.  Some works well 
> on power line noise some not so much.  I’m surprised sometimes at how well 
> some work and how poorly others don’t...and it doesn’t seem to matter how 
> much the radio cost.  Some of the older cheap radios noise blankers do 
> wonders on power line noise and a high dollar radio won’t touch it...go 
> figure.  Won’t do much on atmospheric static crashes because they don’t 
> happen on a timed repetitive timeline which noise blankers are designed to 
> sense.
>
>
>
> Well that’s about all I got...my apologies to any of the ladies out there 
> with my analogy...it was the first vision that popped into my head this 
> morning when envisioning an answer to the question.  No harm intended...
>
>
>
> I’m sure others will have more insightful answers and between the group of 
> us we should answer your questions.
>
>
>
> Best of the Labor Day weekend....
>
>
>
> Cecil Acuff
> Gulfport MS
> K5DL
>
>
> From: Will Jones
> Sent: ‎August‎ ‎30‎, ‎2013 ‎9‎:‎33‎ ‎AM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Explanations of the Different Types of Filtering on 
> Radios
>
>
> There are a few of us who meet together every Wed. morning at a local 
> restaurant to talk about ham radio and stuff.
> Some are new hams. One asked this week a question which I think would be 
> an interesting study in comments.
> He asked, "I have an I.F. shift on my radio and I have read about what it 
> does but don't really understand "what" it does. Also how does it compare 
> to the other features I see on radios such as PBT, notch filters, RIT, DSP 
> noise reduction and noise blankers. Without having a radio with these 
> features on them it is hard to explain just what your signal will sound 
> like when these devices are used.
> So can anyone give us some ideas how to explain these different types and 
> why we would want one and not another and why radios don't have them all 
> on one radio.
> Bill, N4LB in TN
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 