[TenTec] RX366

[Barry N1EU]

If there's interest, I may have the opportunity in the next few days
to do a head-to-head comparison between original subrx and RX-366 on
general coverage bands to answer this (at least for myself) once and
for all.

73, Barry N1EU

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Rick W <ve7tk at yahoo.ca> wrote:
> I guess my RX-366 is broken because it hears on general receive?  ... and WWV as well?
>
> 73,
> Rick
> VE7TK
>
> Website: http://www.ve7tk.com
>
> To:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject:Re: [TenTec] RX366
> From:John Occhipinti <k3ur at att.net>
> Reply-to:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Date:Fri, 17 May 2013 19:46:05 -0400
> List-post:<tentec at contesting.com">mailto:tentec at contesting.com>
> Ray, are you saying that you lose the general coverage capability on the Orion
> II, when you install the DX366? Thanks for your input. John, K3UR
> Net Control, TEN-TEC Nets Sent from my iPad On May 17, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Rsoifer at aol.com wrote: >I can see why a serious contester would want the RX366 but  as a DXer who  >just fools around in contests and doesn't do SO2R, I  personally don't feel  >the need for it.  I would rather not give up  general coverage, which I use  >for WWV, KPH/KSM, Armed Forces Day, etc.  I  do run the v3 firmware for my  >566, and find the SAF feature very  helpful. > >73 Ray W2RS
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec