[TenTec] RX366

[John Occhipinti]

Barry, thank you for taking the time to do the comparison. I have been here at the Dayton Hamvention assisting at the TEN-TEC Booth as a TEN-TEC Ambassador.  I just asked John Henry, TEN-TEC Engineer about the RX366 and he said that the General Coverage audio is slightly deteriorated when the RX366 is installed.

He said many may not even hear the difference. I will be getting the RX366 for my Orion II and it will come in very handy during the TEN-TEC Nets. Thanks again for your input.

John, K3UR
Net Control, TEN-TEC Nets

Sent from my iPad

On May 18, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com> wrote:

> If there's interest, I may have the opportunity in the next few days
> to do a head-to-head comparison between original subrx and RX-366 on
> general coverage bands to answer this (at least for myself) once and
> for all.
> 
> 73, Barry N1EU
> 
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Rick W <ve7tk at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> I guess my RX-366 is broken because it hears on general receive?  ... and WWV as well?
>> 
>> 73,
>> Rick
>> VE7TK
>> 
>> Website: http://www.ve7tk.com
>> 
>> To:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Subject:Re: [TenTec] RX366
>> From:John Occhipinti <k3ur at att.net>
>> Reply-to:Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Date:Fri, 17 May 2013 19:46:05 -0400
>> List-post:<tentec at contesting.com">mailto:tentec at contesting.com>
>> Ray, are you saying that you lose the general coverage capability on the Orion
>> II, when you install the DX366? Thanks for your input. John, K3UR
>> Net Control, TEN-TEC Nets Sent from my iPad On May 17, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Rsoifer at aol.com wrote: >I can see why a serious contester would want the RX366 but  as a DXer who  >just fools around in contests and doesn't do SO2R, I  personally don't feel  >the need for it.  I would rather not give up  general coverage, which I use  >for WWV, KPH/KSM, Armed Forces Day, etc.  I  do run the v3 firmware for my  >566, and find the SAF feature very  helpful. > >73 Ray W2RS
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec