[TenTec] mike

[Bob McGraw - K4TAX]

The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading 
and such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar 
response.

For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708.  One is 
omnidirectional and one is unidirectional.

73
Bob, K4TAX




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


> 708 and 709 have the same element.
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To: 
> tentec at contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
> 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's 
> the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from 
> the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes 
> provoked the question.
>
>
> On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
>> Interesting approach.  Thanks.
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>
>>
>>> Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know me 
>>> and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time 
>>> so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now 
>>> has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>>
>>> So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Bob, K4TAX
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
>>> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
>>> Subject: [TenTec] mike
>>>
>>>
>>>> I made my 707 sound great.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> -- 
> -- John K3GHH
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>