[TenTec] mike

[Rodney]

hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm

-----Original Message----- 
From: Rodney 
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:33 PM 
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment 
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike 

708 has more lowin more bass

-----Original Message----- 
From: Doug Reid
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:59 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


I agree with Bob's remarks.  The two microphones use the same element, but 
achieve different results.

Doug  WD4LNW



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw at Blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading
nd such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar
esponse.
For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708.  One is
mnidirectional and one is unidirectional.
73
ob, K4TAX


---- Original Message ----- 
rom: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
ent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike

708 and 709 have the same element.

-----Original Message----- 
From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To:
tentec at contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's
the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from
the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes
provoked the question.


On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
> Interesting approach.  Thanks.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
>
>> Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know me
>> and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time
>> so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now
>> has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>
>> So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
>> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
>> Subject: [TenTec] mike
>>
>>
>>> I made my 707 sound great.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

-- 
-- John K3GHH

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec at contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec