[TenTec] Rigs at WRTC

Dave Edwards kd2e at comcast.net
Fri Jul 25 18:11:13 EDT 2014


Jon....Many years ago, a few friends and I trucked up a big hill, and 
won our section during the June VHF contest. We barely knew what we were 
doing, but... as you said...location, location, location.  I found the 
Rx to a winning score that weekend.
...Dave
On 7/25/14, 4:29 PM, k6jek wrote:
> I thought it was like real estate, location, location, location. Skill and luck are needed of course but where your are matters a lot, doesn't it?
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2014, at 12:42 PM, K8JHR wrote:
>
>> Not so fast, Dick Tracy.   The argument clearly cuts both ways. A bit of a dilemma, actually.
>>
>> The list was, undoubtedly, posted to suggest what is a good contest radio.
>>
>> But, if, he and you both suggest, the rig is actually immaterial, and it all turns on operator skill and good fortune, then any discussion of what radio is used is misplaced.   You cannot have both ways.  It is inconsistent to say the rig does not affect the result, and then praise any one or more radios as better contest radios because operators used them over other options.  Either the rig matters, or it does not.  If it matters, then it is a fact 5 of six 6 used by the top three teams were made by ICOM.  If it does not matter, we should not try to draw any conclusion, or make any statement about the radio based on contest use or result - because, as you say, it does not matter.
>>
>>  From all accounts offered so far, the most likely reason teams chose the K3s, is it is small light, and easy to travel.  If the rig is immaterial, then any talk about the rig's technical and ergonomic prowess is logically misplaced.
>>
>> Or, if you want to say the rig matters, then we are back to the fact the ICOMs stole the show.
>>
>> ------------------ JHR  -------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/25/2014 9:57 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
>>> This discussion by Jim, Rick, Carl and others is VERY interesting
>>> regarding WRTC.
>>>
>>> The list of radios, brands and models and the number of each, including
>>> the logging programs used, adds tremendous creditability solely to the
>>> operators.  Again it to me points out the radio becomes a somewhat minor
>>> part of the success equation.  The major part clearly is the operators
>>> and their efficiency in the process using the chosen tools at hand.
>>>
>>> Jim, K9YC, did a fine analysis of various parameters supporting the
>>> final results.
>>> ______________________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>



More information about the TenTec mailing list