[TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21
Howell, D. Haney
howellh at winthrop.edu
Wed Dec 9 19:16:42 EST 2015
Since everyone on this list appears to use Flex radios, perhaps it's time to start a real Ten Tec site. My shack is obviously full of junk. Omni's, 509, Corsair II, Orion, etc.
Letting a computer do all the work is not my idea of ham radio.
Haney
k2xn
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, "tentec-request at contesting.com" <tentec-request at contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
> tentec at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tentec-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tentec-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series (terry foskey)
> 2. Re: Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series (Carl Moreschi)
> 3. Re: Dirty Transmitters (Jim Brown)
> 4. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (Spencer)
> 5. any stray RX-366s? (Allan Taylor)
> 6. Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (k7mks at comcast.net)
> 7. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (rick at dj0ip.de)
> 8. Re: Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface (rick at dj0ip.de)
> 9. Re: Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (Barry N1EU)
> 10. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (Charles Strickland)
> 11. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (Barry N1EU)
> 12. Re: Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (W8BVH)
> 13. Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface (Joe Word)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 00:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
> From: terry foskey <n5tf at yahoo.com>
> To: "TenTec at contesting.com" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series
> Message-ID:
> <1582457235.1342190.1449622210849.JavaMail.yahoo at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Barry - that's good news on the behringer, looks good, got?buttons and two VFO knobs.
> Sent with my dirty transmitter stained fingers,N5TF,
> Terry
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:04:36 -0500
> From: Carl Moreschi <n4py3 at earthlink.net>
> To: terry foskey <n5tf at yahoo.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series
> Message-ID: <56677E24.4070509 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> My N4PY Pegasus Plus will allow you to use a Tmate2 3 knob, 9 button
> device with all Flex radios and any radio that I support.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 58 Hogwood Rd
> Louisburg, NC 27549
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.n4py.com&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=8zUjk_F4GHnR2nQVEnHZHvn1ki04K_uuAbOUVFZFezg&e=
>
>> On 12/8/2015 7:50 PM, terry foskey via TenTec wrote:
>> Barry - that's good news on the behringer, looks good, got buttons and two VFO knobs.
>> Sent with my dirty transmitter stained fingers,N5TF,
>> Terry
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:01:19 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters
> Message-ID: <5667997F.4050201 at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>> On Tue,12/8/2015 4:43 PM, terry foskey via TenTec wrote:
>> You should do your part and buy the best performing rigs out there and as the bar continues to get set higher, you should sell and again buy the best.
>
> Yes, and I've done exactly that. My rigs are all K3s. I sold a pair of
> FT1000MPs to buy the first one. :)
>> That said, the last two sentences in the report echoed my comments, in summary - most Hams don't care and will continue to buy what some of you classify as dirty. I would also offer that Hams operating these "Dirty" rigs aren't violating any FCC or statutory regulations.
>
> Oh, but they ARE in violation. FCC Rules clearly state that hams SHALL
> use the minimum bandwidth needed for the transmitted mode. ARRL Labs
> tests most new rigs when they are introduced. You can find a comparison
> of their measurements about 20 of those rigs here.
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__k9yc.com_TXNoise.pdf&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=5AhCUjnVmS6KVM4NshSQpEurll_X_nvf1v1C3lfAst0&e= Their tests clearly show that the K3 is the
> cleanest of all mass-produced rigs, and that the Kenwood TS590S is a
> close second. The 590S is not an expensive rig, selling for about $1500
> last I looked. Those other rigs -- Yaesu and ICOM, use 2-4x the
> bandwidth of the K3, and they do that because they are VERY careless
> about their design of CW keying!
>
>> So it comes down to opinions. Opinions with the only ability to change the status quo is to talk with their pocketbooks. I don't believe the opinions expressed in these forums will do little to sway Yaesu, which seems to be the worst offender according to commentary.
>
> I don't place much credence in opinions, and I almost never express
> opinions. When I say something about a technical issue, I am stating
> facts as I have taken the time to learn them.
>
>> I plan to operate my dirty beasts (Yaesu and Flex) in a multi-station setup later this coming year, we will see what a menace they really are....The Yaesu FTDX 1200 was operated last year with no issues. We will run some tests this year in an effort to identify impacts.
>
> No need to "run some tests" unless you're going to improve on what ARRL
> Labs is doing with very expensive and state of the art test gear.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>> N5TF,Terry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:40 AM
>> To: tentec at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters
>>
>>> On Mon,12/7/2015 8:41 PM, rick at dj0ip.de wrote:
>>> IMO, the 5000 should not be allowed on the bands unless QRP.
>> Likewise with most Yaesu and ICOM rigs.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:33:52 -0700
> From: Spencer <w1gak at arrl.net>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <5667A120.1010108 at arrl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Use a boat anchor radio and your SDR, listen to WWV on both. The
> latency, if any, is easy to detect.
>
> Spencer W1GAK
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:48:40 -0800
> From: Allan Taylor <k7gt.cw at gmail.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] any stray RX-366s?
> Message-ID:
> <CABX+CBqZYsYS5nh3=29RSk410cPaQ7v83JuSC3o5oiC2jkeHqw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> With all this talk about how bad the Orion II is, I am wondering if
> someone is willing to part out one and sell me the RX-366 that
> is troubling them.
>
> All fun aside, I would really like to locate a RX-366 to purchase and
> put in my newly acquired Orion II.
>
> --
> 73 Allan K7GT
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
> From: k7mks at comcast.net
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID:
> <283991195.4151027.1449640971942.JavaMail.zimbra at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled about the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which may be a roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine also has the optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 filters with the 3 optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out how to get 4 receiving bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3 positions.
>
> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on the 1.8 KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the reason to do this.
>
> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>
> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>
> joe k7mks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> that page is ,iussing from my manuals
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:42:40 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at dj0ip.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <000e01d1325d$91050e30$b30f2a90$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> NO, absolutely not!
>
> We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios should
> or should not have.
> Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to Ten-Tec.
>
> I found Duane's comments but also replies from Carl and some of the others
> to be the most valuable tidbit of information that I have picked up on any
> ham reflector for quite some time.
>
> THANKS guys!
>
> 73, Rick - DJ0IP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Berg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:25 PM
>
> Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot more
> appropriate on the Flex reflector?
>
> Steve WA9JML
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:51:45 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at dj0ip.de>
> To: "'terry foskey'" <n5tf at yahoo.com>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec
> Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
> Message-ID: <003601d1325e$d611a410$8234ec30$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I'm pretty sure they are not.
>
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of terry foskey via TenTec
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 1:24 AM
> To: TenTec at contesting.com
> Cc: terry foskey
> Subject: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
>
> Barry is correct.
> Tobias (DH1TW) website: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dh1tw.de_PowerSDR-2DUI&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=Q7CTI-cCYc23QonZ06JLZ2ZjOMU2cXjddQEKLhL_K6M&e= Not sure Flex is willing to give up code for 6000 series.
> N5TF, Terry
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:01:06 -0500
> From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID:
> <CAFmfzDtpMExJ0iyhp2N=e9=krsddLCkZRBTkqdvvn2v=VHZMhg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Page 2-9 of the Corsair II manual clearly explains how the "XTAL" switch
> points to the broader three filters of the four in ssb and the narrower
> three filters of the four in cw.
>
> I would guess that there's a jumper on the socket so that the receiver will
> still function if that slot is selected by the XTAL switch, but it wouldn't
> be advisable to intentionally select that slot if it's only jumpered.
>
> Barry N1EU
>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:02 AM, <k7mks at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled about
>> the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which may be a
>> roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine also has the
>> optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 filters with the 3
>> optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out how to get 4 receiving
>> bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3 positions.
>>
>> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on the 1.8
>> KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the reason to do
>> this.
>>
>> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>>
>> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>>
>> joe k7mks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> that page is ,iussing from my manuals
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:02:23 -0500
> From: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss at earthlink.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <000b01d13271$15092870$3f1b7950$@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Over the last eight years I have used and still do, many SDR devices and
> various software packages. The latency varies widely among these.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Spencer
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:34 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
>
> Use a boat anchor radio and your SDR, listen to WWV on both. The latency,
> if any, is easy to detect.
>
> Spencer W1GAK
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:12:19 -0500
> From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID:
> <CAFmfzDtDzp9apZwMt+Ok+tFsjUMSDe+SbEsy+zNDJOZLzk7ErQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I invite interested parties to read the entire latency thread I started
> over on the Flex forum:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.flexradio.com_flexradio_topics_receive-2Dlatency&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=TXfKCavtGfrUHhWF5N8WSq_HXW113nIueBcCh6YV5PM&e=
>
> The bottom line, as far as I can tell, is that Flex engineering made a
> clear decision, at this point anyway, of providing only ULTRA steep (i.e.,
> vertical) filter slopes resulting in higher latency. I make the argument
> that shallower filter slopes are often preferable and should be an option.
>
> When you look at the filter slopes of the Orion (combined xtal roofing
> filter plus 199 taps dsp), it's no coincidence that they match the filter
> slopes on the Omni VI+ (3 xtal filters in the signal path in cw). The
> Elecraft K3 slopes are similar as well. And those somewhat shallower
> slopes are what I prefer - they sound better to my ear on cw ragchewing,
> and they allow me to hear callers that are slightly off my cq'ing frequency
> in a contest. The PowerSDR line of SDR's (old Flex and new OpenHPSDR/ANAN)
> allow the user to widely adjust the filter slopes, but the new Flex
> (SmartSDR) doesn't allow this (yet).
>
> Barry N1EU
>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:42 AM, rick at dj0ip.de <Rick at dj0ip.de> wrote:
>>
>> NO, absolutely not!
>>
>> We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios should
>> or should not have.
>> Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to Ten-Tec.
>>
>> I found Duane's comments but also replies from Carl and some of the others
>> to be the most valuable tidbit of information that I have picked up on any
>> ham reflector for quite some time.
>>
>> THANKS guys!
>>
>> 73, Rick - DJ0IP
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve
>> Berg
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:25 PM
>>
>> Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot more
>> appropriate on the Flex reflector?
>>
>> Steve WA9JML
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:30 -0500
> From: "W8BVH" <w8bvh at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID: <7414D7AD55F34864893F590040ACB0ED at DENDESK1>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hello Joe,
> I was going to scan your page request from my manual I bought from Ten Tec a
> few years ago but find that page 3-34 is missing from this manual also.
> Should you find that page somewhere I would appreciate a copy and likewise
> should I forage one up I'll send to you. Strange that a new manual copy
> would not have that page in it.
> Best regards,
> Ralph Howes
> W8BVH
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k7mks at comcast.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 1:02 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
>
>
>> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled about
>> the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which may be a
>> roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine also has the
>> optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 filters with the 3
>> optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out how to get 4 receiving
>> bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3 positions.
>>
>> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on the 1.8
>> KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the reason to do
>> this.
>>
>> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>>
>> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>>
>> joe k7mks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> that page is ,iussing from my manuals
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:11:36 -0500
> From: Joe Word <n9vx.joe at gmail.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
> Message-ID:
> <CAEk6-=uRdE_oDeL-KHzh8M48eK8PpZL=aMXX7_tNEZGH7ifvFQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> This is what they provide for the 6000 series.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.flexradio.com_amateur-2Dproducts_flex-2D6000-2Dsignature-2Dseries_smartsdr-2Dapi_&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=H5UUozOFf4ygFKEvYQZEbS3fxrAYQ2m1uNncMfqR3kg&e=
>
> There are various people writing interfaces to Apple and etc machines.
>
> Joe N9VX
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21
> ***************************************
More information about the TenTec
mailing list