[TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21

Wed Dec 9 19:59:54 EST 2015

Well, Haney and John, I'm guessing that besides myself, the others in this
discussion also have long histories of TenTec ownership, and still have TT
rigs in the shack.  Most of the current discussion has been about
possible/perceived SDR shortcomings vs. TT radios - something TT will need
to address if they follow current technology and continue to include more
SDR implementations.  But now we're in a 'metadiscussion' which probably
will get zapped by the moderator!

	73, Duane

Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
ac5aa at ac5aa.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Simon
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 6:43 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21

Yes I agree, I suppose I'll have to get rid of my Argonaut 516 , my Scout
555 and my Orion II 566 and get a radio that is computer controlled, doesn't
have any knobs or switches, just one big screen.  UGH!!!

73, John de VK2XGJ
Guns don't kill people
Driver's on mobile phones do!

-----Original Message-----
From: Howell, D. Haney
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:16 AM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21

Since everyone on this list appears to use Flex radios, perhaps it's time to
start a real Ten Tec site.  My shack is obviously full of junk.  Omni's,
509, Corsair II, Orion, etc.

Letting a computer do all the work is not my idea of ham radio.

Haney
k2xn

> On Dec 9, 2015, at 12:02 PM, "tentec-request at contesting.com" 
> <tentec-request at contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
>    tentec at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.c
> om_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLss
> K8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf
> 5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN
> _Gy7wUWmE&e= or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' 
> to
>    tentec-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    tentec-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series (terry foskey)
>   2. Re: Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series (Carl Moreschi)
>   3. Re: Dirty Transmitters (Jim Brown)
>   4. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (Spencer)
>   5. any stray RX-366s? (Allan Taylor)
>   6. Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (k7mks at comcast.net)
>   7. Re: Flex Radio for Contesting (rick at dj0ip.de)
>   8. Re: Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface (rick at dj0ip.de)
>   9. Re: Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please (Barry N1EU)  10. Re: 
> Flex Radio for Contesting (Charles Strickland)  11. Re: Flex Radio for 
> Contesting (Barry N1EU)  12. Re: Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please 
> (W8BVH)  13. Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface (Joe Word)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 00:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
> From: terry foskey <n5tf at yahoo.com>
> To: "TenTec at contesting.com" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series
> Message-ID:
>    <1582457235.1342190.1449622210849.JavaMail.yahoo at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Barry - that's good news on the behringer, looks good, got?buttons and 
> two VFO knobs.
> Sent with my dirty transmitter stained fingers,N5TF, Terry
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:04:36 -0500
> From: Carl Moreschi <n4py3 at earthlink.net>
> To: terry foskey <n5tf at yahoo.com>,    Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>    <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Behringer DJ Panel For Flex 6000 Series
> Message-ID: <56677E24.4070509 at earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> My N4PY Pegasus Plus will allow you to use a Tmate2 3 knob, 9 button 
> device with all Flex radios and any radio that I support.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 58 Hogwood Rd
> Louisburg, NC 27549
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.n4py.com&d=CwI
> CAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK
> 6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2
> g&s=8zUjk_F4GHnR2nQVEnHZHvn1ki04K_uuAbOUVFZFezg&e=
>
>> On 12/8/2015 7:50 PM, terry foskey via TenTec wrote:
>>  Barry - that's good news on the behringer, looks good, got buttons 
>> and two VFO knobs.
>> Sent with my dirty transmitter stained fingers,N5TF, Terry 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.
>> com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgL
>> ssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzD
>> xjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fT
>> EQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:01:19 -0800
> From: Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters
> Message-ID: <5667997F.4050201 at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>> On Tue,12/8/2015 4:43 PM, terry foskey via TenTec wrote:
>> You should do your part and buy the best performing rigs out there 
>> and as the bar continues to get set higher, you should sell and again 
>> buy the best.
>
> Yes, and I've done exactly that. My rigs are all K3s. I sold a pair of 
> FT1000MPs to buy the first one. :)
>> That said, the last two sentences in the report echoed my comments, 
>> in summary -  most Hams don't care and will continue to buy what some 
>> of you classify as dirty.  I would also offer that Hams operating these
"Dirty"
>> rigs aren't violating any FCC or statutory regulations.
>
> Oh, but they ARE in violation.  FCC Rules clearly state that hams 
> SHALL use the minimum bandwidth needed for the transmitted mode. ARRL 
> Labs tests most new rigs when they are introduced. You can find a 
> comparison of their measurements about 20 of those rigs here.
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__k9yc.com_TXNoise.p
> df&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdg
> HqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoEl
> sr97Ndx2g&s=5AhCUjnVmS6KVM4NshSQpEurll_X_nvf1v1C3lfAst0&e=
> Their tests clearly show that the K3 is the cleanest of all 
> mass-produced rigs, and that the Kenwood TS590S is a close second. The 
> 590S is not an expensive rig, selling for about $1500 last I looked. 
> Those other rigs -- Yaesu and ICOM, use 2-4x the bandwidth of the K3, 
> and they do that because they are VERY careless about their design of 
> CW keying!
>
>>  So it comes down to opinions.  Opinions with the only ability to 
>> change the status quo is to talk with their pocketbooks.  I don't 
>> believe the opinions expressed in these forums will do little to sway 
>> Yaesu, which seems to be the worst offender according to commentary.
>
> I don't place much credence in opinions, and I almost never express 
> opinions. When I say something about a technical issue, I am stating 
> facts as I have taken the time to learn them.
>
>>  I plan to operate my dirty beasts (Yaesu and Flex) in a 
>> multi-station setup later this coming year, we will see what a menace 
>> they really are....The Yaesu FTDX 1200 was operated last year with no 
>> issues.  We will run some tests this year in an effort to identify
impacts.
>
> No need to "run some tests" unless you're going to improve on what 
> ARRL Labs is doing with very expensive and state of the art test gear.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>> N5TF,Terry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim 
>> Brown
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:40 AM
>> To: tentec at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Dirty Transmitters
>>
>>> On Mon,12/7/2015 8:41 PM, rick at dj0ip.de wrote:
>>> IMO, the 5000 should not be allowed on the bands unless QRP.
>> Likewise with most Yaesu and ICOM rigs.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.
>> com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgL
>> ssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzD
>> xjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fT
>> EQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:33:52 -0700
> From: Spencer <w1gak at arrl.net>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <5667A120.1010108 at arrl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> Use a boat anchor radio and  your SDR, listen to WWV on both. The 
> latency, if any, is easy to detect.
>
> Spencer W1GAK
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:48:40 -0800
> From: Allan Taylor <k7gt.cw at gmail.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] any stray RX-366s?
> Message-ID:
>    
> <CABX+CBqZYsYS5nh3=29RSk410cPaQ7v83JuSC3o5oiC2jkeHqw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> With all this talk about how bad the Orion II is, I am wondering if 
> someone is willing to part out one and sell me the RX-366 that is 
> troubling them.
>
> All fun aside, I would really like to locate a RX-366 to purchase and 
> put in my newly acquired Orion II.
>
> -- 
> 73     Allan    K7GT
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
> From: k7mks at comcast.net
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID:
>    <283991195.4151027.1449640971942.JavaMail.zimbra at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled 
> about the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which may 
> be a roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine also 
> has the optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 filters 
> with the 3 optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out how to 
> get 4 receiving bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3 positions.
>
> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on the 
> 1.8 KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the 
> reason to do this.
>
> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>
> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>
> joe k7mks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> that page is ,iussing from my manuals
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:42:40 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at dj0ip.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <000e01d1325d$91050e30$b30f2a90$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>
> NO, absolutely not!
>
> We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios 
> should or should not have.
> Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to Ten-Tec.
>
> I found Duane's comments but also replies from Carl and some of the 
> others to be the most valuable tidbit of information that I have 
> picked up on any ham reflector for quite some time.
>
> THANKS guys!
>
> 73, Rick - DJ0IP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve 
> Berg
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:25 PM
>
> Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot 
> more appropriate on the Flex reflector?
>
> Steve WA9JML
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:51:45 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at dj0ip.de>
> To: "'terry foskey'" <n5tf at yahoo.com>,    "'Discussion of Ten-Tec
>    Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
> Message-ID: <003601d1325e$d611a410$8234ec30$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="UTF-8"
>
> I'm pretty sure they are not.
>
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of terry 
> foskey via TenTec
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 1:24 AM
> To: TenTec at contesting.com
> Cc: terry foskey
> Subject: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
>
> Barry is correct.
> Tobias (DH1TW) website: 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.dh1tw.de_Power
> SDR-2DUI&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr
> 3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzP
> WoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=Q7CTI-cCYc23QonZ06JLZ2ZjOMU2cXjddQEKLhL_K6M&e=
> Not sure Flex is willing to give up code for 6000 series.
> N5TF, Terry
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.c
> om_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLss
> K8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf
> 5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN
> _Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:01:06 -0500
> From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID:
>    
> <CAFmfzDtpMExJ0iyhp2N=e9=krsddLCkZRBTkqdvvn2v=VHZMhg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Page 2-9 of the Corsair II manual clearly explains how the "XTAL" 
> switch points to the broader three filters of the four in ssb and the 
> narrower three filters of the four in cw.
>
> I would guess that there's a jumper on the socket so that the receiver 
> will still function if that slot is selected by the XTAL switch, but 
> it wouldn't be advisable to intentionally select that slot if it's 
> only jumpered.
>
> Barry N1EU
>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:02 AM, <k7mks at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled 
>> about the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which 
>> may be a roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine 
>> also has the optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 
>> filters with the 3 optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out 
>> how to get 4 receiving bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3
positions.
>>
>> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on 
>> the
>> 1.8
>> KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the reason 
>> to do this.
>>
>> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>>
>> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>>
>> joe k7mks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> that page is ,iussing from my manuals 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.
>> com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgL
>> ssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzD
>> xjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fT
>> EQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:02:23 -0500
> From: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss at earthlink.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID: <000b01d13271$15092870$3f1b7950$@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>
> Over the last eight years I have used and still do, many SDR devices 
> and various software packages.  The latency varies widely among these.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Spencer
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 10:34 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
>
> Use a boat anchor radio and  your SDR, listen to WWV on both. The 
> latency, if any, is easy to detect.
>
> Spencer W1GAK
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.c
> om_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLss
> K8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf
> 5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN
> _Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:12:19 -0500
> From: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting
> Message-ID:
>    
> <CAFmfzDtDzp9apZwMt+Ok+tFsjUMSDe+SbEsy+zNDJOZLzk7ErQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I invite interested parties to read the entire latency thread I 
> started over on the Flex forum:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.flexrad
> io.com_flexradio_topics_receive-2Dlatency&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-Els
> TDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nA
> ZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=TXfKCavtGfrUHhWF5N8
> WSq_HXW113nIueBcCh6YV5PM&e=
>
> The bottom line, as far as I can tell, is that Flex engineering made a 
> clear decision, at this point anyway, of providing only ULTRA steep 
> (i.e.,
> vertical) filter slopes resulting in higher latency.  I make the 
> argument that shallower filter slopes are often preferable and should be
an option.
>
> When you look at the filter slopes of the Orion (combined xtal roofing 
> filter plus 199 taps dsp), it's no coincidence that they match the 
> filter slopes on the Omni VI+ (3 xtal filters in the signal path in 
> cw).  The Elecraft K3 slopes are similar as well.  And those somewhat 
> shallower slopes are what I prefer - they sound better to my ear on cw 
> ragchewing, and they allow me to hear callers that are slightly off my 
> cq'ing frequency in a contest.  The PowerSDR line of SDR's (old Flex 
> and new
> OpenHPSDR/ANAN)
> allow the user to widely adjust the filter slopes, but the new Flex
> (SmartSDR) doesn't allow this (yet).
>
> Barry N1EU
>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:42 AM, rick at dj0ip.de <Rick at dj0ip.de> wrote:
>>
>> NO, absolutely not!
>>
>> We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios 
>> should or should not have.
>> Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to 
>> Ten-Tec.
>>
>> I found Duane's comments but also replies from Carl and some of the 
>> others to be the most valuable tidbit of information that I have 
>> picked up on any ham reflector for quite some time.
>>
>> THANKS guys!
>>
>> 73, Rick - DJ0IP
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
>> Steve Berg
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:25 PM
>>
>> Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot 
>> more appropriate on the Flex reflector?
>>
>> Steve WA9JML
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.
>> com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgL
>> ssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzD
>> xjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fT
>> EQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:30 -0500
> From: "W8BVH" <w8bvh at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
> Message-ID: <7414D7AD55F34864893F590040ACB0ED at DENDESK1>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>    reply-type=original
>
> Hello Joe,
> I was going to scan your page request from my manual I bought from Ten 
> Tec a few years ago but find that page 3-34 is missing from this 
> manual also.
> Should you find that page somewhere I would appreciate a copy and 
> likewise should I forage one up I'll send to you. Strange that a new 
> manual copy would not have that page in it.
> Best regards,
> Ralph Howes
> W8BVH
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k7mks at comcast.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 1:02 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Corsair II - Filter Classtime Please
>
>
>> I"m enjoying a late S/N (25xx), which is new to me, and am puzzled 
>> about the filters. The manual says there is a 2.4 KH filter (which 
>> may be a roofing type but was not called that in the 1980s) and mine 
>> also has the optional 1.8 500 Hz and 250 Hz filters. That makes 4 
>> filters with the 3 optional ones installed. I have yet to figure out 
>> how to get 4 receiving bandwidths with a panel switch of only 3
positions.
>>
>> There is a note on Page 3-14 about removing or cutting a jumper on 
>> the
>> 1.8
>> KHz socket if this filter is to be installed. Not sure of the reason 
>> to do this.
>>
>> Can anyone scan page 3-34 Corsair II Parts List. Missing from my manual.
>>
>> Thanks for the help from TT fans.
>>
>> joe k7mks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> that page is ,iussing from my manuals 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.
>> com_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgL
>> ssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzD
>> xjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fT
>> EQhN_Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:11:36 -0500
> From: Joe Word <n9vx.joe at gmail.com>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Flex 5000 PowerSDR Interface
> Message-ID:
>    
> <CAEk6-=uRdE_oDeL-KHzh8M48eK8PpZL=aMXX7_tNEZGH7ifvFQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> This is what they provide for the 6000 series.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.flexradio.com_
> amateur-2Dproducts_flex-2D6000-2Dsignature-2Dseries_smartsdr-2Dapi_&d=
> CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLssK8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZi
> PnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97N
> dx2g&s=H5UUozOFf4ygFKEvYQZEbS3fxrAYQ2m1uNncMfqR3kg&e=
>
> There are various people writing interfaces to Apple and etc machines.
>
> Joe  N9VX
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.contesting.c
> om_mailman_listinfo_tentec&d=CwICAg&c=82NFg6qkAwmLf-ElsTDuMzmUibVPgLss
> K8WcsyJgSiA&r=qLRr3eMSdgHqtZiPnK6NYt_TFH3FwDzD-b4QQg-nAZI&m=ji57IzDxjf
> 5Z54SVsV3tJlrMJWzPWoPoElsr97Ndx2g&s=INw-2rDLwqZHrRmU-GmSD_JOTP79fTEQhN
> _Gy7wUWmE&e=
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TenTec Digest, Vol 156, Issue 21
> ***************************************
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec