[TenTec] Eagle and Zero Beating

[Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP]

Good point, Darrell.  I agree with you.

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of demerson
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:30 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle and Zero Beating


There was a nice article about netting on CW by G3MCK in a recent issue of
"The KeyNote", the FISTS newsletter.  Called "Rites and Rituals" the article
included:
"... I doubt if anybody nets exactly all the time (and in fact a slight
mis-netting can be helpful, for example if two stations reply to a CQ it can
be very difficult to distinguish one from the other if they are both the
same strength, sending at the same speed and correctly netted). ...  
I would suggest that netting to within 100 Hz is usually acceptable and is a
reasonable aim ..."

    So, if you are netting 100 Hz high, I would say that's perfect. 
Netting exactly on frequency may not always be desirable.

     73
               Darrel, aa7fv.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec