[TenTec] kHz / kC

[Tony Lelieveld]

So, what about Volta, Ohm, Faraday, Maxwell, Henry and all the other 
scientists.  Without many of them we would still be in the dark ages.  Just 
my opinion.
73, Tony VE3DWI.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clayton Brantley via TenTec" <tentec at contesting.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] kHz / kC


>I think it's time to kick ole Hertz where it hurts and return to kc and mc. 
>My radiodoesn't really care, but the freqs we use should be know for 
>something other thansome guy we never knew.
>
> See you on 7.256 mc
>
> Clayton N4EV
>
>      From: K3GHH <k3ghh at arrl.net>
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 7:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] kHz / kC
>
> Amusing observation on the kc/s -> Hz terminological change: Some sharp
> fellow, and I forget who and where it was published, suggested naming
> the unit for Charles Proteus Steinmetz instead of Heinrich Hertz. Pretty
> clever, I thought!
>
> --John K3GHH
>
> On 03/28/2015 06:50 PM, Marsh Stewart wrote:
>> Rick,
>>
>> I was of course just messin' with you. I know you use dual (separate) 
>> core
>> 4:1 current baluns (and for a good reason).
>>
>> The whole Hz and cps discussion has seemed silly to me. And yes, I agree
>> with you: it's 73 - Best Regards - and not 73's - Best Regards's (or 
>> would
>> that be Best Regardses'?
>>
>> Again :-)
>>
>> 73,
>> Marsh, KA5M
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick -
>> DJ0IP / NJ0IP
>> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 5:22 PM
>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] kHz /kC
>>
>> Most of my dual-core baluns are built with the cores side by side.
>> However I don't think you were fishing for a serious answer here Marsh.
>> Maybe it's just late, but somehow I didn't understand that question.
>>
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Marsh
>> Stewart
>> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 10:16 PM
>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] kHz /kC
>>
>> Rick,
>>
>> Yes, but is your 4:1 current balun stacked or dual cores? :-)
>>
>> 73, Marsh, KA5M
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick -
>> DJ0IP / NJ0IP
>> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 3:11 PM
>> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] hz / KC
>>
>> 73 doesn't own anything, so why the apostrophe?
>> And when I say goodbye to some, I don't say goodbyes.
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> -- 
> -- John K3GHH
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>