[TenTec] Centurion 422b troubleshooting help needed
A R
raf_3 at msn.com
Wed Feb 24 02:04:09 EST 2016
Just completed an internal visual inspection of the failed MJ15001 using a 20X stereo scope with alternate light sources. Unfortunately my "shade tree" failure analysis/forensic lab doesn't include the capability to provide pics of the 20X views.
My conclusions are based on what the 20X visual inspection revealed, and over 30 years of device/component failure anayses in a former life. In the interest of brevity here on the list, I won't include details of what was observed, but will offer detailed info via direct email (off-list) to anyone interested.
Suffice to say that I will not be replacing the failed MJ15001 with another MJ15001. It is my opinion that the failure was due to a device manufacturing/QC issue, and NOT an application-induced overstress of the part.
Since there was no evidence of electrical or thermal overstressing of the transistor, I will replace the failed part with a JANTX 2N3055 which, although not as robust (spec-wise), at least theoretically it will have been inspected and screened to preclude the latent-failure conditions observed in the failed MJ15001. Receipt of the JANTX parts is pending. Assuming they pass incoming inspection and test, one will get installed in the Centurion, and after a reasonable burn-in/shake-down period, I'll update with results.
73,
Allen--W7GIF
----- Original Message -----
From: A R<mailto:raf_3 at msn.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<mailto:tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Centurion 422b troubleshooting help needed
Duane, Andy, and Carter:
Wow. Just confirmed that the TO-3 bias transistor (MJ15001) in my 422b is shorted collector-to-emitter. Admittedly, 4 failures isn't a huge sample, but it sure suggests that there's either a quality problem with the MJ15001's, or the circuit (application) is overstressing their spec'd characteristics/limits. Did you all re[place the faied transistors with MJ15001's, or some other transistor? My 422 manual calls out a 2N3055, which is a "15A, 60V, 115W" device, compared with the MJ15001's "20A, 140V, 250W" rating. Without knowing the root cause of Q1 failures, I'm tempted to "socketize" Q1. At least replacing Q1 again (if needed) wouldn't be quite the PITA (and board-stressing) as it is with a soldered-in Q1. How much failure-free time on your amps since replacement of Q1? Thanks for the feedback and good info!
73,
Allen--W7GIF
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com<mailto:TenTec at contesting.com<mailto:TenTec at contesting.com%3Cmailto:TenTec at contesting.com>>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec%3Chttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com<mailto:TenTec at contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
More information about the TenTec
mailing list