[TenTec] Orion III Survey

[Reed Krenn]

Well now. We have all (me included) pretty much ignored Mike's request and
follow up clarification as to what - and *only* what - he was asking.

Mike, I apologize for my part in it by referencing the Orange Dot. Long
time reflector members know what it is about, and was meant to be humorous.

I am a very delighted Orion owner, and if any future designs would work
with the Orion front panel mold, then go for it!

Regards,

Reed / WW3A

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Carl Moreschi <n4py3 at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Making a new transceiver that uses superhetrodyne now would be like making
> a car that used a point ignition system now.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 58 Hogwood Rd
> Louisburg, NC 27549
> www.n4py.com
>
> On 2/21/2017 4:37 PM, Lee wrote:
>
>> Why do we NEED to go that way Barry?
>>
>> -Lee-
>> WA3FIY
>>
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> From: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu at gmail.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: 2/21/2017 4:21:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion III Survey
>>
>> ;
>> Snip
>> ;
>> You will eventually NEED to go to a direct sampling architecture (Orion
>> 4), although you might get away
>>
>>> with one legacy dsp IF rig (Orion 3).
>>>
>>> Barry N1EU
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>