[TenTec] Phishing attempt!
john brown
n2ydf at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 7 13:14:26 EST 2017
Just received a very similar email from a 6 meter group. tnx John.
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 7, 2017, at 12:00 PM, "tentec-request at contesting.com" <tentec-request at contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
> tentec at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> tentec-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> tentec-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Reflector Op-eds (k8mp at aol.com)
> 2. Omni D 160 (Michael Hutchison)
> 3. Re: Omni D 160 (Mike Bryce)
> 4. Re: Omni D 160 (Steve Ellington)
> 5. Re: Argonaut VI (rick at dj0ip.de)
> 6. Re: Current Firmware (Vic Klein)
> 7. Phishing Attempt on list members (Bill Cotter)
> 8. Re: Phishing Attempt on list members (rick at dj0ip.de)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:36:47 -0500
> From: k8mp at aol.com
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Cc: oldlongbeard at yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
> Message-ID: <15aa6695f03-1fd9-170b2 at webprd-m64.mail.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Glad you got 'er done Greg!
>
> Seeya, Joe. K8MP
>
> Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg S via TenTec <tentec at contesting.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Cc: oldlongbeard <oldlongbeard at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 07:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
>
>
>
>
> Joe, et al, a big thank you for the instructions on the TenTec wiki page on how to replace the relays on the low pass filter board in the Omni VI/+! I tackled mine last weekend, and it was very easy using your instructions. She will get the roofing filter installed next, then, the I.F. filter tap for a pan adapter. (Thanks to Barry, N1EU, as well!!). YES, this IS the place for tech questions!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg Schippers, KC8HXO
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2017 at 16:00, <Joe Papworth via TenTec (<a href="mailto:tentec at contesting.com?">mailto:tentec at contesting.com</a>)> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>> This is definitely the place for Ten Tec techie stuff. I've been bailed out by the smart guys on here more than once.
>> My comments were regarding all the non-techie opinion type stuff which can get old.
>>
>> Seeya, Joe, K8MP
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Howard w0ep <<a href="mailto:w0ep at w0ep.us">w0ep at w0ep.us</a>>
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <<a href="mailto:tentec at contesting.com">tentec at contesting.com</a>>
>> Sent: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 2:59 pm
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Reflector Op-eds
>>
>>
>> Is there a better place to ask the technical questions?
>> I'm happy to go elsewhere if that's what I should do.
>>
>> I have a TS-820 that I literally brought back from the dead with
>> the help of the TS-520/820/530/830 group on yahoo. I'm happy
>> to admit that I'm on the pull-it-out-of-the-dumpster end
>> of ham radio. I won't be calling TenTec support or buying
>> their new radios. Not that I don't want to, but I don't have
>> the resources to commit to that.
>>
>> So, if there is a more appropriate place, just point me in the right direction.
>>
>>
>> Chris
>> w0ep
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 3/5/2017 7:28 AM, Joe Papworth via TenTec wrote:
>>> There are too many posts on here of people's opinions. One guy throws something out and it escalates from there.
>>> On the other hand, guys ask technical questions and they sometimes go unanswered.
>>> Can we strike a balance?
>>>
>>> Later, Joe, K8MP
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> <a href="mailto:TenTec at contesting.com">TenTec at contesting.com</a>
>>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec" target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:TenTec at contesting.com">TenTec at contesting.com</a>
>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec" target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> <a href="mailto:TenTec at contesting.com">TenTec at contesting.com</a>
>> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec" target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> <a href="mailto:TenTec at contesting.com">TenTec at contesting.com</a>
> <a href="http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec" target="_blank">http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec</a>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:03:15 +0000
> From: Michael Hutchison <mhutchers at msn.com>
> To: "tentec at contesting.com" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID:
> <CY4PR03MB24721CBCF6E45D0950EA6F9DAE2F0 at CY4PR03MB2472.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I go to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:48:57 -0500
> From: Mike Bryce <prosolar at sssnet.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID: <9493C6E2-A1D5-4829-827F-C95AF5C8955D at sssnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> heterodyne mixer crystal is not working. either bad or loose
>
> Common trouble with the omni series.
>
> Try removing the crystal, spray the sockets with deoxit . Also, try and crimp the socket a bit to tighten their grip
>
> mike, wb8vge
>
>
> Mike Bryce
> prosolar at sssnet.com
>
>
>
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Michael Hutchison <mhutchers at msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I go to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:14:45 -0500
> From: Steve Ellington <steven4lq at gmail.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni D 160
> Message-ID:
> <CAHBT4RtyTnoESUyUTMXk4ibr3rbuaCQGMxJbcJddQqfMUEs4KQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Did it ever work on 160 since you've had it? Is the crystal even there??
>
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Mike Bryce <prosolar at sssnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> heterodyne mixer crystal is not working. either bad or loose
>>
>> Common trouble with the omni series.
>>
>> Try removing the crystal, spray the sockets with deoxit . Also, try and
>> crimp the socket a bit to tighten their grip
>>
>> mike, wb8vge
>>
>>
>> Mike Bryce
>> prosolar at sssnet.com
>>
>>
>>
>>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:03 PM, Michael Hutchison <mhutchers at msn.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anybody Have an idea what might be wrong with my Omni d on 160--- when I
>> go to 160 the display says 1.000 ---the radio works fine on all other bands
>> ---any ideas on where to start --thanks Mike w7zox
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:02:00 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at DJ0IP.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
> Message-ID: <002201d29719$1b119780$5134c680$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes, the Argo is a fine QRP radio.
>
> I regret that I don't have one.
> I "almost" got an Argo6.
>
> 2 years ago at the hamfest in Friedrichshafen we had one last Argo6 in stock and on display on our booth. I said "if nobody buy it before the end of the hamfest, I will." On the 3rd day about one hour before the end of the hamfest, an OM from HB0 bought it. <<sniff>>
>
> After that we placed more stock orders for Argo6, Eagle, 418, and OM7 but never received any more radios from Ten-Tec again.
>
> In the meantime, the Euro has taken a dive against the $$$, which has caused everything imported for America to be about 25 to 30% more expensive than they were before. Keep in mind we were already 30 or 35% more expensive that the stateside price, so that has really put a damper on our ability to sell US-made equipment over here.
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of tim
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 12:54 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am afraid I was one of those who was some what vocal about adding 160m and leaving out 12m. I am aware that TT received positive comments about adding 160. One comment I had was that I could just see all those SOTA guys climbing to the top of a mountain and putting up their 160 meter inverted V or vertical/end fed. Hehehe.
>
> Still it was a good radio with a fabulous receiver. Would I buy another with 12 meters? Yes, but an Omni and Rebel are higher on the list.
>
>
> Tim
> KE4KE
>
>
>
>> On 03/06/2017 04:33 PM, rick at dj0ip.de wrote:
>> Mike, I explained how both versions can be true.
>> Jack and I still exchange emails regularly.
>> I KNOW why 12m was not in the radio. We discussed this and I told he for a QRP radio, it would have been better to leave out 160m. Of course contesters would disagree.
>>
>> As I said, it might also be deemed a cost issue because they would have needed to get a larger box.
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike Bryce
>> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 8:37 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI
>>
>> rick,
>>
>> that?s the story I got from John Henry.
>>
>> I was one of the beta tester for that rig and that question came up right from the start. Where were 60 and 12 meters. That?s what John Heny told the group of beta testers.
>>
>> If and when Mike gets the Argonaut VI back into production, from my point of view, I?d go with 60 meters and forget 12?.but that?s just me
>>
>> Mike, WB8VGE
>>
>> Mike Bryce, WB8VGE
>> the heathkit shop
>> SunLight energy systems
>> J e e p
>> o|||||||o
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 1:41 PM, rick at dj0ip.de <Rick at DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually it had nothing directly to do with cost.
>>> The reason those bands are not in the radio is, there was no space to
>>> place the bandpass filters.
>>> Of course they could have found a larger box, which would have cost
>>> more, so maybe that's the reason John said "cost".
>>>
>>> According to Jack in a private conversation we had, in order to make
>>> space for another band, he would have had to reduce the size of the
>>> cores of the BPF inductors, which would slightly reduce their
>>> performance, so he opted to leave 12m out. We never spoke about 60m.
>>>
>>> According to Mike in a private telephone conversation with me, the new
>>> Argo6's will have 12m. I don't think he commented on 60m. And he did
>>> not say how they are doing it but if he says 12m is in, then I have no
>>> reason to doubt him.
>>>
>>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>>> (ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:06:23 -0500
> From: "Vic Klein" <vhklein at ptd.net>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Current Firmware
> Message-ID: <000c01d29732$dbc4c330$934e4990$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> The last Omni VII firmware version is 1.037 which was posted by John Henry
> on the Yahoo Omni VII site. The last one on the Ten Tec site is 1.036, which
> had a small bug in the handling of remote CW memories that John fixed in the
> one on the Yahoo site. Both use an installer which makes it pretty easy, but
> that said I was unable to do it with just a serial port connection. John
> suggested I install through the Ethernet port, and that worked perfectly.
> All the rest of the software listed with the Omni VII product description on
> the tentec.com site is current.
>
>
>
> =Vic=
>
> WA4THR
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------
>
>
> To:
>
> tentec at contesting.com <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com>
>
>
> Subject:
>
> [TenTec] Current Firmware
>
>
> From:
>
> Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw at verizon.net <mailto:wn3vaw%40verizon.net> >
>
>
> Reply-to:
>
> Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com
> <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com> >
>
>
> Date:
>
> Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:48:27 -0600 (CST)
>
>
> List-post:
>
> <tentec at contesting.com <mailto:%3Ca%20href=> ">mailto:tentec at contesting.com
> <mailto:tentec%40contesting.com> >
>
>
> Good morning all,
>
>
>
>
>
> Quick question... has anyone on the list done a recent Omni VII firmware
>
> upgrade from the files currently on the "new" Ten Tec site?
>
>
>
>
>
> If so, any issues or anything to watch out for?
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd thought I'd downloaded the files years ago from the old RFSquared site;
> if
>
> I did, they've been misplaced in the last shack computer updated. I've now
>
> been advised that some issues I ran into during the contest this last
> weekend
>
> might indicate I need to update the firmware, and I before I do so, well,
> I'd
>
> prefer to avoid issues ahead of time. (And I can load the firmware from an
> old
>
> XP laptop, since I've heard some have had issues with Win 7)
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:24:32 -0500
> From: Bill Cotter <n4lg at qx.net>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
> Message-ID: <20170307162439.ECCE5AC9B03 at mx.contesting.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> Beware of the phishing attempt you may receive (see below). Someone
> has harvested names from this list and is targeting "ETO_Alpha" and
> "TenTec" members.
>
> 73 Bill N4LG
>
>
>
>
>> Delivered-To: n4lg at qx.net
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=qth.net;
>> s=default;
>> t=1488899182;
>> bh=2q8mJcsT+JP7sIr32C+G52Q2fbL7ZUtns79YrzTvk0g=;
>>
>> h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
>> List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc;
>>
>> b=maFKnA6WbwlNMqkuKcYepgSU9OMStJgY7IrcBmCZdHlHj/ELHfyMtS66GX4hlNREm
>>
>> C06nVH19x7Xsa82g8P4iD2drI+T6Y+Ws++1lbbmm61nV4Ud+FOYF18VKRIuBgUzrCd
>> XxZC9QNe6q6v77JYpWQXWUlJv6sggae0X+z0xDZM=
>> X-Original-To: eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net
>> Delivered-To: eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net
>> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 23:04:30 +0900
>> To: eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net
>> X-Sender-Warning: www.cep.co.jp has no MX records
>> X-Sender-Warning: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 210.255.105.34
>> (deferred)
>> X-SpamExperts-Class: unsure
>> X-SpamExperts-Evidence: Combined (0.85)
>> X-Recommended-Action: accept
>> X-Filter-ID:
>> s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIZpY1ikLiFgbVmksaMuwG0C5OxuSEtuFWwwaLyTv3J4q92PNDpgLsd6D
>>
>> dd/s7VM53g3T+DSfEwaX1fMB91s1i0eF3rqxKFd/nPW1dGGCWU27VYc7hTwcygp99vNHI1A0PI9k
>>
>> qIVyJCaIhM768GQfA9/4JGAMHFcVQyGQV1YVAWCkHHASJNUmoOHSoqgqxfHmWWFKriOvK5c3NjZx
>>
>> hn31ZU4XXoJpPBs4SXre2qkDo6tZnxyFa+Q+jcWWki4nd/MNUQioT+LYyf+F84tisMSPnVK7RuLD
>>
>> 0cO47gH2HJlBchoL647lNwN4qOsSZg+fYhVZG6JgW08GUKyIRv5R4YS10xebidA8HjwZkZUDJOsO
>>
>> TC4gLPcreuTRO8h4kE9NVybyZjW4m2RFNwnqNAb/sRVZUsobuA68LiYaufnE2X20a92NAs6k3Y4z
>>
>> hdrc7mVMTsXqUoUqJg7F2WHEjt37MS2lIdOrf/zvkfJ5qxZ6Hdc351pSh/Q9kPA7nEm8yCUrkAIp
>>
>> zU0HC+OHo93JT2u4lL5dx5YjZwWTcp0rVeO1dO6omiH/21XAikGmQzbz+8y1rHkBAO56plfq0eVU
>>
>> aVfwajC1K+JsJP8LNZ+wb8Fh6AzaRQJBMtwBgiVFxbzJQf+pUBa+8CGwfqeNO0Vta0QHISXmTwUu
>>
>> LKQ+ubjvZxdX/Mk3mf2JSr4HXZ2fULtXUdtZdiUjUGrQb3qPqhqT+JdhmUwb5ih9gqLsGblhZTuo
>> ottz/Xz3
>> X-Report-Abuse-To: spam at quarantine4.antispamcloud.com
>> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
>> Subject: [ETO_Alpha] Account Suspension
>> X-BeenThere: eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
>> List-Id: Discussion of ETO Alpha <eto_alpha.mailman.qth.net>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/options/eto_alpha>,
>>
>> <mailto:eto_alpha-request at mailman.qth.net?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/eto_alpha/>
>> List-Post: <mailto:eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net>
>> List-Help: <mailto:eto_alpha-request at mailman.qth.net?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha>,
>> <mailto:eto_alpha-request at mailman.qth.net?subject=subscribe>
>> From: "Chase AcctSec. Team chasesecurity-team_noreplies--- via
>> ETO_Alpha"
>> <eto_alpha at mailman.qth.net>
>> Reply-To: alt.y7-fdeawx2 at yopmail.com
>> Cc: "Chase AcctSec. Team chasesecurity-team_noreplies at chse.com"
>> <cosmophone at yahoo.com>
>> Sender: "ETO_Alpha" <eto_alpha-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>> X-MagicMail-OS: Inactive
>> X-MagicMail-UUID: a09ea8bc-0347-11e7-98bf-0019bb366edc
>> X-MagicMail-SourceIP: 69.16.227.189
>> X-MagicMail-EnvelopeFrom: <eto_alpha-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>> X-MagicMail-Whitelisted: Yes
>>
>> Hi,
>> Due to a recent compromise of our servers by some chinese hackers,
>> It has
>> been mandated that we carry out an integrity check to isolate and
>> disable
>> all
>> suspicious accounts. For now we have already placed a red flag on
>> several
>> accounts
>> thereby preventing them from carrying out any financial transactions
>> whatsoever.
>> To ensure that your account was not compromised, you are required to
>> ascertain
>> your identity, failure to do this within 24 hours will lead to account
>> service
>> suspension.
>> Login and Ascertain Your Identity
>> Thanks for your anticipated co-operation and understanding.
>> The Accounts Team,
>> For Chase Online
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ETO_Alpha mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:ETO_Alpha at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:33:21 +0100
> From: "rick at dj0ip.de" <Rick at DJ0IP.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
> Message-ID: <001501d29760$8940ddf0$9bc299d0$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Bill,
>
> You beat me to the punch.
> I was just about to post a message, warning about the same type of message
> that I received through the Argonaut Group (also contesting.com group).
> I haven't seen any email traffic on that group for months, and now this
> email came.
>
> Here is the FULL TEXT of the email:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Hi,
> Due to a recent compromise of our servers by some chinese hackers, It has
> been mandated that we carry out an integrity check to isolate and disable
> all suspicious accounts. For now we have already placed a red flag on
> several accounts thereby preventing them from carrying out any financial
> transactions whatsoever.
> To ensure that your account was not compromised, you are required to
> ascertain your identity, failure to do this within 24 hours will lead to
> account service suspension.
> Login and Ascertain Your Identity
>
> [ DANGEROUS LINK REMOVED ]
>
> Thanks for your anticipated co-operation and understanding.
> The Accounts Team,
> For Chase Online
> ______________________________________________________________
> Argonaut_USERS_Group mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/argonaut_users_group
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Argonaut_USERS_Group at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> DELETE THIS TYPE OF EMAIL IMMEDIATELY!
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Cotter
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 5:25 PM
> To: tentec at contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Phishing Attempt on list members
>
> Beware of the phishing attempt you may receive (see below). Someone has
> harvested names from this list and is targeting "ETO_Alpha" and "TenTec"
> members.
>
> 73 Bill N4LG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TenTec Digest, Vol 171, Issue 14
> ***************************************
More information about the TenTec
mailing list