[TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 242, Issue 7

[DJ]

Does anyone repair the Ten Ten Omni 6+
Thank you

DJ k6rcl

> On Feb 22, 2023, at 9:00 AM, tentec-request at contesting.com wrote:
> 
> Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
> 	tentec at contesting.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	tentec-request at contesting.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	tentec-owner at contesting.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Jupiter 538 (Mike Bryce)
>   2. Re: Jupiter 538 (ROLAND HOWELL)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 12:55:01 -0500
> From: Mike Bryce <prosolar at sssnet.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter 538
> Message-ID: <124DF11A-113B-43D3-A2F6-C1CB2A109C63 at sssnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset=utf-8
> 
> Ten Tec did in fact change the parts in the Jupiter. They did the same for the Scout, too. Some Scouts have bipolar devices, newer ones had MOSFETs.
> They were very lacked in updated the manuals
> 
> mike, wb8vge
> ?The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you never  know if they are genuine?
> 
> ?Abraham Lincoln
> 
>> On Feb 21, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Louis Ciotti <lciotti1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I am not very familiar with the Jupiter, but this has the feeling of someone attempting a repair using either parts they had on hand or what they could purchase easily.   I could be way off here and TT did an update and never revised the BOM/manual.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 20:59:02 +0000 (GMT)
> From: ROLAND HOWELL <snowy.howell at btinternet.com>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter 538
> Message-ID: <4c808c66.10490.18675c5cb7c.Webtop.122 at btinternet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> Thanks for your update, it is obvious that i must change like for like, 
> thats a shame as i have already purchased some components for it.
> 
> Snowy G0HZE
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Mike Bryce" <prosolar at sssnet.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 Feb, 23 At 17:55
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter 538
> Ten Tec did in fact change the parts in the Jupiter. They did the same 
> for the Scout, too. Some Scouts have bipolar devices, newer ones had 
> MOSFETs.
> They were very lacked in updated the manuals
> mike, wb8vge
> ?The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that you never  know if they 
> are genuine?
> ?Abraham Lincoln
> On Feb 21, 2023, at 11:44 AM, Louis Ciotti <lciotti1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not very familiar with the Jupiter, but this has the feeling of 
> someone attempting a repair using either parts they had on hand or what 
> they could purchase easily.   I could be way off here and TT did an 
> update and never revised the BOM/manual.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of TenTec Digest, Vol 242, Issue 7
> **************************************