TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ...
Scott Cowling
dfi@cyberhighway.net
Tue, 11 Feb 1997 15:43:23 -0700 (MST)
Billy,
My vote is for the 8' elevated vertical. If the fence is below your
radials, it will have little effect on your pattern. As I stated in an
earlier post, I beleive that 4 elevated radials is as effective as 30 or
more buried or on-ground ones. This is especially true if your radials are
short (1/4 wave or less). I use a 33' vertical on the roof for 40M with 8
radials kind of haphazardly arranged to fit on the roof. It works very
well. I know this is kind of subjective, but I beleive it works better than
the ground mounted one I had years ago at a different house.
The 160M quarter wave balloon supported vertical I used in the past 3
contests (ARRL160, W1BB, CQWW160CW) had only 2 elevated radials and it
worked very well.
73 es GL,
Scotty WA2DFI
dfi@cyberhighway.net
Tempe, AZ
At 14:24 2/11/97 -0800, you wrote:
>My spin on this is ... 16 ground mounted radials to a 0.25w vertical
>mounted say 10' away from a 4' "wire fence of some form" verses the
>same vertical mounted with the feedpoint 8' above the ground but
>using only 4 elevated radials, making it 4' ABOVE the fence ...
>
>Which is "more better" ?
>
>What say ? Looking for "real world" here ... TU !
>
>73 Billy AA4NU
>aa4nu@ix.netcom.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & N4VJ / K4AAA