TopBand: QST Antenna Tuner Review
W8JITom@aol.com
W8JITom@aol.com
Tue, 25 Feb 1997 11:59:50 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-02-25 10:19:42 EST, hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver)
writes:
<<
To be sure, there are some tuners that are better than others. N4XM's
looks like the best of the bunch. But a little extra work outside means
less expensive shack heating inside.
>>
Actually if you added higher value capacitors to any of the other T network
tuners they would work as well as the Xmatch.
If you read carefully, you will see it is a T network tuner with large C.
That hurts
ten and fifteen meter performance, but improves 160 a whole bunch.
The problem with most T network tuners is they do not have enough
capacitance,
so Q is too high on 160. This was all covered in rec.radio.amateur.antenna
<<
Meters, switches would not hurt, so what about the Heath SA2060?
Anyone have performance data?
>>
Look at the amount of capacitance. That will govern 160 performance
into low impedance or capacitive reactive loads.
73 Tom
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
Sponsored by: Akorn Access, Inc. & N4VJ / K4AAA