TopBand: Radial current
w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net
Thu, 5 Jun 1997 14:03:11 +0000
Hi Ward,
> For example, assume ground is reasonably uniform under the radials. So
> current imbalance is primarily due to differences in length or arrangement
> of the radials. Thus, changing the length of the radials would not
> greatly affect the loss due to ground-related effects, but would strongly
> affect current balance.
If I understand correctly, you wonder what would happen if
earth effects were uniform, and the current unbalance was due to
length or placement of the radials.
Let's look at the case of two radials side by side. If the radials
couple to each other nearly as tight, or perhaps a bit tighter, than
they couple to their surroundings, and one radial off in another
direction that has little mutual coupling to the other two radials.
In that case the current would divide between the two close spaced
radials, but the coupling effects to the surroundings would be nearly
the same as if they were one wire. (A folded dipole would be an
extreme example, the net radiation is the radiation caused by the
sum of currents in each wire.)
In this example, if currents were made equal, unwanted far field
radiation would INCREASE. The two closely coupled radials would
radiate more than the single radial opposite them.
Once again equal currents wouldn't indicate the least
unwanted radiation or loss.
73, Tom W8JI
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com