TopBand: Coaxial Cable Traps
George & Marijke Guerin
gmguerin@voyager.net
Fri, 07 Aug 1998 20:59:55 -0400
Hi Gang:
A early in the 1980's some of pre-reflector topbanders had a discussion
about traps made out of coaxial cable vs. traps made out of descrete
components for multi-band inverted L antennas. This was prompted by the
heating in the original RG-58 coaxial traps W0CD made for the first two
Battle Creek Special antennas.
Our second step was to try the marine grade RG-8X, which was somewhat
better, but still heated more than we wanted. After a trip to one of
the Pacific islands by a group led by W0RLX and K9AJ, where the 80 meter
trap heated enough to bend by the pull of the top loading wire on a CPVC
form, we went to descrete components.
At the time we thought about RG-58 insulated with Teflon , but were
warned off by a sales representative from a wire company. He said the
center conductor of the coaxial cable, wound over a 1.9 or 2.4 inch
diameter form would eventually drift in the insulation, as the Teflon
would flow slightly from winding and from each inductive heating from a
night's operation by a DX-pedition. Was this fellow knowledgeble, or
just overly conservative? I never experimeted with the Teflon coax, so
there is no experience in Battle Creek.
Your comments please, either direct or on the reflector. (Bill's
choice)
George, K8GG
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com