Topband: 3D2C (Notes from a topband zombie)

[Garry Shapiro]

That is the first clear indication that there is indeed a vertical on 160. If
so, and propagation is the culprit, prop is very poor. No indication, however,
that they have an amp on topband.

Garry, NI6T

jh1kla@mbd.nifty.com wrote:

> According to the recent WEB site's NEWS,(the effective date is
> not clear)
> "Work on 80 and 160m is o-kay. They have 2 stations separated
> each other 150mtrs and vertical antennas."
>
> Another hand,on sunday night I heard a strong CQ signing 3D2CI
> at 1825 after T32EQ disappeared.On that time from the NEWS,
> they got a trouble of a generator and were running low power.
> But that signal is much stronger than T32EQ.
> Also the OP used computer keyer and high speed 5NN.
> This trick matches the pirate of 3D2CI.......
>
> Barry N1EU wrote:
> >Also mysterious was their simultaneous appearance this morning around 1045Z
> >on 3795 and 1822.  The 75M operation was clearly uninterrupted (I was
> >monitoring) and evidently some operators (not I) heard their signal on 1822
> >and W8JI spotted them.  Not possible if they are using a single Titanex for
> >the low bands . . .
> >
> >73,
> >Barry  N1EU
> >
> >
> >>From: Garry Shapiro <ni6t@intuitive.com>
> >>I find it hard to imagine that, as Ivo, 5B4ADA
> >>has relayed, a Titanex is in use.
> >
>
> --
> jh1kla@mbd.nifty.com
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

--
160 meters-not a band but an obsession