Topband: RM 11305/11306

Jim Kearman jkearman at att.net
Tue Jan 10 10:29:09 EST 2006


From: "Dave Bowker" <dbowker at mail.sjv.net>

> This flies in the face of the IARU band plans in Regions 1, 2 & 3 as well as the 
> ARRL's own 160M 
> band plan, all of which do allocate a narrow BW segment which is harmonious 
> across all regions.

The RM talks about regulation, not voluntary bandplans. I too found it odd that ARRL felt it unnecessary to partition 160 -- and only 160 -- by bandwidth. See my previous post re voluntary bandplans. This would be a good starting point for a comment on ARRL's RM.

73,

Jim, KR1S
http://kr1s.kearman.com/


More information about the Topband mailing list