Topband: Top band QSLs

Jeff w7jw at arrl.net
Mon Jun 26 16:24:55 EDT 2006


Gene, AD3F recently posted the following.

"This weekend I've been going over my Top band QSLs for the purpose of
determining progress toward my WAS award. I've known that I need KL7 worked
and confirmed, plus I need QSLs from three other states. What I did not know
until I reviewed the ARRL's Rules today was that these QSLs must all say
2x[mode] for me to qualify for a <specialty award> for 160M. The specific
ARRL Rule says:".......

An alternative to consider is using the LoTW system. I've never had an LoTW
confirmation refused for WAS or DXCC. I was fortunate to earn WAS on 160m CW
my first year on thanks to a lot of good luck, long nights and high contest
activity. Unfortunately I'm still waiting for a CW op in the states of
HI,MS,NV,ND and WY to get on the LoTW system. I too have had cards rejected
for not being correctly filled out, including an HB0 I worked on 2m eme in
the early 90's (long before digital modes were used). The DXCC desk accepted
it as a country on 2m, but only for a mixed mode not CW because it didn't
say CW. It said two way EME, reports were RO.

LoTW is a good alternative for you paper chasers like me to think about.
Chasing guys like ZP6CW around the bands including 160 is great fun. Knowing
that a qso with him will be confirmed via LoTW within a few days is very
motivating to me. Now, if the summer static would just subside a bit, I'm
still looking for ZP6CW to get into my 160m log.  BTW Gene, KL7J has a huge
160m signal and uses the LoTW regularly. To all LoTW users, I say thank you.

Jeff W7JW



More information about the Topband mailing list