Topband: K4M on TopBand
Petr Ourednik
indians at xsmail.com
Wed Oct 21 07:44:42 PDT 2009
Hello gentlemen,
I have the humble supplication...
Please stop the huge discussion like "they are gd ops cos I worked them"
or they are bd cos I did not cathced them during 4 nites" etc.
Who worked K4M or FT5 etc. is lucky. Who did not worked them has to try
it next time. Each DX-pedition is different in most aspects and our
setups are not like VoA BC stations so it's just hobby. I am pretty sure
that ops on the "other" side makes their maximum to satisfy us.
Sri for this bothering email.
CU on the air,
73 - Petr, OK1RP
BTW: I did not worked them too ;)
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:12:35 -0000, "G4GED Dave"
<radiodave.g4ged at tiscali.co.uk> said:
> Art K6XT wrote>>>
>
> > Except that K4M devoted much effort to, and did in fact work a number of
> > west EU stations on topband. Someone tallied them up earlier. Do I
> > recall 150+ QSO's? Surely FT5GA (which would have been new for me as
> > well) had no such score with west US.
>
> OK Art, Please tell us who these 150+ Western EU stations are then?
>
> Because when I look in the K4M on-line log I see for 160m; 1 x G, 3 x
> GM, 0
> x other
> G entities, 0 x F, 0 x EA, 0 x EI, 0 x CT, 4 x PA, 4 x ON. Pardon me if
> I've missed anyone but that's not far off what we here consider to be in
> western EU for ham radio propagation purposes.
>
> So please tell us who the other 138+ are?
>
> Maybe you're confusing political EU with geographical EU?
>
> 73
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
More information about the Topband
mailing list