Topband: [TowerTalk] your opinion about ICE RF limiter

[Robert Harmon]

I use one between my K3 and 160 meter flag antenna for receive.
No attenuation at all in received signal and no worries now about too much RF getting 
back into the K3 from the receive ant line.  
I second what Dan, W8CAR said.  Peace of mind, (small insurance to pay to protect your expensive HF XCVR)

Bob
K6UJ


On Mar 30, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Dan Kovatch wrote:

> I have used one for many years and it saved the front end of a TS 830s when 
> an elevated radial drooped and touched a beverage antenna. I have used it on 
> my FT1000mp since 1993 with no failures or additional noise noticed. Well 
> worth the money and the piece of mind it brings
> 
> Dan W8CAR
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Felipe Ceglia
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:45 PM
> To: Tower and HF antenna construction topics. ; topband at contesting.com
> Subject: Topband: your opinion about ICE RF limiter
> 
> Hello,
> 
> What do you guys think about ICE RF limiter
> (http://www.iceradioproducts.com/reconly.html#rflimiter)?
> 
> I need to protect my RX antenna ports, and being a passive solution
> (doesnt need keying from radio), it sounds promising.
> 
> Does it add any noise to RX?
> 
> Any pros/cons?
> 
> 73 tu,
> 
> http://www.iceradioproducts.com/reconly.html#rflimiter
> Felipe Ceglia - PY1NB
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PR1T team member /// Rio DX Group member /// Araucaria DX Group member
> http://dxwatch.com /// http://reversebeacon.net /// http://riodxgroup.com
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk