Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages

ZR zr at jeremy.mv.com
Wed May 23 07:08:58 PDT 2012


I can understand why a fence would be a problem. Theoretically at least 
parallel Beverages should have no radiation/coupling. But that then means an 
absolutely perfectly balanced and terminated pair of lines.

The closest I had a parallel pair was years ago and with Slinkys. After 
having one up for a few years and knowing its characteristics I put up 
another about 5 feet away and didnt note any degradation.

Carl
KM1H



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix at inet.net.nz>
To: <topband at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 4:05 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages


> Hi Mike,
>
> I have not tried to run two Bevs like that, but I have tried to run one
> close to a wire fence.  The best F/B I achieved was about 8 dB.  I would
> think that the two scenarios would be very similar.
>
> 73, Greg ZL3IX
>
> On 2012-05-23 06:20 a.m., rfman45 wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>   For various reasons I am considering two single, parallel but 180deg 
>> opposing direction beverages on the same supports rather than a single 
>> switchable bidirectional beverage.  The bevs would be separated by 12 to 
>> 18 inches or so. I've read that parallel bevs present performance 
>> degradation issues but has anyone had any experience with this type of 
>> setup versus the traditional bidirectional beverage? Thanks for reading 
>> this and for any thoughts you could offer. 
>> Mike  W2LO
>> _______________________________________________
>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>>
> _______________________________________________
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2425/5017 - Release Date: 05/23/12
> 



More information about the Topband mailing list