Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW -BTW

[Grant Saviers]

How about a compass and declination map?  A bit simpler & good enough 
+/- 2 degrees.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/image.shtml

The standard for course plots on nautical charts is the letter "T" for 
true or "M" for magnetic after the degrees number and then an arrow to 
indicate for which direction the marking is valid.  Of course, for 
antennas we really never care about magnetic headings so the only "T" 
makes sense to quote.

Grant KZ1W

On 11/1/2013 10:12 AM, Charlie Cunningham wrote:
> Hi, Don
>
> Well, we can improve on that by using a solar determination of true North.
> The way  that I do it for my antenna arrays is:
>
> 1.0  Use a weather site to determine local sunrise and sunset times for your
> location on the day that you are going to make the determination.
>
> 2.0  Split the difference to determine the time for your local solar noon.
>
> 3.0  At the time of your local solar noon, a vertical shaft (determined by
> plumb line or spirit level) will cast a shadow that points to true North.
> (Best done on sunny day of course!)
>
> 73.
> Charlie, K4OTV
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Don Kirk
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 11:31 AM
> To: Tom W8JI
> Cc: topband
> Subject: Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW -BTW
>
> OK, while we are on the topic another very big factor to think about is
> magnetic north vs. true north (I have tried to not bring this up in the
> past).  I don't expect any response to this, but this has always been in
> the back of my mind and wonder what headings are really being reported
> (what is the reference, magnetic north or true north that each station is
> using when he reports a heading).
>
> 15 to 20 degrees difference for those of you in the New England
> states...................  Same problem out in the Northwest US, but
> opposite polarity 15 to 20 degrees.
>
> Don (wd8dsb)
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Tom W8JI <w8ji at w8ji.com> wrote:
>
>> My resolution is not as good as some people here, either. But where
> there's
>>> a will, there's often a way.  :-)
>>>
>> Many of the headings are misleading. Having been through this before
>> several times, much of the data is always grossly overstated.It is common
>> to exaggerate ability to determine direction.
>>
>> It's almost impossible to obtain several degree direction accuracy without
>> either a rotatable loop with GOOD common mode rejection (some popular loop
>> antennas can have a ~20 degree or more skew between what are supposed to
> be
>> 180 degree apart nulls, because they have poor feed designs) or an
>> interferometer of normal receiving antennas.
>>
>> An 8-circle array in a very clear location with proper hardware design and
>> good element spacing can get within about 20 degrees.
>>
>> Single long Beverages in an array of 8 antennas maybe within 30-35
> degrees.
>> Broadside Beverages with wide spacing (~5/8th or wider) within about 20
>> degrees.
>>
>> A three direction array only within about 60 degrees or so, if in a clear
>> spot and properly constructed.
>>
>> An interferometer with a few wavelengths spacing within a few degrees.
>>
>> A calibrated rotatable small loop without common mode skewing and in the
>> clear, which is actually a pretty rare case, can be within a few degrees.
>>
>> My eight direction 350 ft diameter 8 circle, located out in a field 1500
>> feet or so from any re-radiators, can only resolve within +-22 degrees
> with
>> good reliability. When I use it as part of a calibrated interferometer
>> against Beverage arrays spaced ~1000 feet away, I can resolve the
>> directional difference between two signals 50 miles apart in New England.
>>
>> When you draw the lines, be sure to allow for resolution of the antennas,
>> and not the absolute numbers.
>> _________________
>> Topband Reflector
>>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>