Topband: and KDKA

Joe Subich, W4TV lists at subich.com
Sun Sep 15 10:56:08 EDT 2013


Looking at the table of allocations over the years, WLW was the only
station in the continental US that did not share its frequency with
any other US station *at night*.  It was a "class 1A" station with
no other full time "secondary".  That has changed in the last ~30 years
- first with the addition of night time operation on the west coast
with a significant directional pattern (perhaps KALL in N. Salt Lake
City) and more recently a proliferation of class D stations.

The proliferation over the last 20 years of nighttime operation by
secondary stations with reduced protection requirements on "the clears"
is a real shame as it has made the AM band a mess of indistinguishable
signals at night - even locally in many metro areas.  Just 15 years ago
when we moved to Florida most of the dominant clears could be received
quite easily at night on a car radio or simple boom box.  Now, with the
additional stations, the noise from "digital radio" and the general
increase in "noise pollution," only a couple of the closer clears are
reliably audible.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 9/15/2013 10:04 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:
> WLW shared the frequency with other stations, I believe one in Canada.
> I'm pretty sure that is why they had to use a directional pattern at
> night. Throughout a long history, WLW shared (and time shared) channels.
>
> The tower is a diamond shaped half wave, which makes it electrically
> shorter than a half wave.
>
>>> Another interesting point -- WLW was a 50kW clear channel station,
>>> and one of a handful that had their frequency to themselves at night
>>> for all of North America, which is why the Commission might have
>>> considered licensing them for 500kW. As I recall, the other might
>>> have been WOAI, on 1200 kHz.
>>>
>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>> _________________
>>> Topband Reflector
>>>
>> Hi Jim:
>>
>> For Years I have believed that WSM, 650, was in that category.
>> Goodness knows, We can't miss the GRAND OLE OPRY"
>>
>> 73,
>> Mike, W5UC
>
> _________________
> Topband Reflector
>


More information about the Topband mailing list