Topband: WLW

Bill Aycock billaycock at centurytel.net
Wed Sep 18 15:41:03 EDT 2013


I agree that mark makes valuable contributions, but I wish he had not put it 
out under the "WLW" Logo.
Bill--W4BSG

-----Original Message----- 
From: Juan EA5RS
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:27 PM
To: topband at contesting.com
Cc: 'Mark Connelly' ; 'Bill Aycock'
Subject: Re: Topband: WLW

I could agree that some of the messages on this thread might have been
boring, but I find Mark's posting VERY interesting pointing to an actual
propagation effect not fully explained by propagation models.

73
Juan EA5RS

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] En nombre de Bill Aycock
Enviado el: martes, 17 de septiembre de 2013 18:52
Para: topband at contesting.com; Mark Connelly
Asunto: Re: Topband: WLW

I HATE it when Topbanders get bored; thing like this "WCKY<WLW" etc flood
out.
Bill--W4BSG

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Connelly
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:15 AM
To: topband at contesting.com
Subject: Topband: WLW

1.7 megawatts out of WLW was no doubt the highest power run by anyone in the
Western Hemisphere on medium wave.


Duba, Saudi Arabia runs 2 megawatts on 1521 kHz all the time.  No wonder
that it often screams in here on the coast of Massachusetts around local
sunset, as in this recording:
<http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/audio1/dx_saudi_arabia-1521_20060503_2300z.mp3>
or this one:
<http://www.qsl.net/wa1ion/audio1/dx_1521_saudi_arabia_20081029_2300z.mp3>


1521 has proven to be a useful propagation indicator to the Middle East, as
is the UAE station (R. Farda) on 1575 with 800 kW and Kuwait (R. Sawa) 1548
(600 kW).


The signals are at least 15 dB stronger at seashore sites than at locations
even just 5 to 10 miles inland, especially if the intervening land is sandy
or rocky.  A receiving antenna that is substantially elevated would cut
those losses some at the inland site.


Mark Connelly, WA1ION
South Yarmouth, MA


<<
>He told us it was put in for Crosley who got a bug in his butt to  see what
>the rig would really do. The meter showed the total current on the  three
>finals. One night he cranked it up as far as it would go. Keep in mind,
>the
>voltage on the finals was 17,500 volts, as I remember. He got that meter up
>to 100 amps. Do the math. He burnt up some local fences that  night.
>
>Of course, 13 transmitters (with plug-in coils) each  running 220,000 watts
>simultaneously on several bands down the road at  VOA was astonishing, but
>that 1,700,000 watts at WLW was stuck in our minds  all the way home that
>night.  We were TopBand guys,  afterall!
>
>73, Best DX, Barry, W9UCW
>>
_________________
Topband Reflector

_________________
Topband Reflector

_________________
Topband Reflector 



More information about the Topband mailing list